Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
The Good, the Bad, and The Ugly of an Effective 30-Minute Voir Dire In a Criminal Case
By Robert B. Hirschhorn and Alexandra C. Figari
Often, the process of jury selection is akin to making sausage — the process is ugly but the finished product is a thing of beauty. Witness a recent aggravated assault with a deadly weapon prosecution: An argument in a bar escalated into a serious confrontation involving deadly weapons outside. A jury was left to sort out criminal culpability or lack thereof.
The Efficiency of a One-Page Questionnaire
Prior to trial, the defense, led by criminal defense attorney Dick DeGuerin, was under the impression from the lead counsel that the judge only gave the parties in a felony criminal case an hour for voir dire, and that the judge only used jury questionnaires in capital murder cases. The defense wanted to use a questionnaire because jurors are hesitant to convey their true thoughts, feelings, and opinions in the courtroom.1 The defense enlisted the assistance of the authors, who prepared a specialized one-page questionnaire2 on triplicate carbonless paper with a cardboard backin
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or firstname.lastname@example.org
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.