Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
By Ivan J. Dominguez; Jack King
U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Warrantless GPS Surveillance Case
By Ivan J. Dominguez and Jack King
On June 27, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the Obama administration’s appeal of United States v. Jones, a federal court decision holding that the government’s use of a global positioning satellite tracking device on a defendant’s vehicle for a month was a search that required a warrant.
In 2005, police investigating alleged drug activity secured a warrant, valid for 10 days, from a federal judge who authorized the attachment in the District of Columbia of a GPS device to a vehicle then being used by defendant Antoine Jones. Law enforcement then used the GPS device to record Jones’s movements around-the-clock for four weeks — but never went back to court to ask for more time. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, in an opinion by Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg, held that was an unreasonable search, distinguishing the pre-GPS law relied upon by the government.
“First, unlike one’
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or email@example.com
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.