Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
Will an 'Independent' Internal Investigation Always Make a Difference to a Corporation?
By Marc S. Raspanti,Divya Wallace
Media and journal headlines routinely report alleged misconduct at the highest levels of corporate America. At times, in response to a preemptive disclosure of corporate misdeeds, a corporation will announce that it is conducting an “independent internal investigation.” In some instances, a charge of wrongdoing by a corporation, its officers, or members of its Board of Directors could result in a significant risk to the future viability of that corporation.
At first blush, the phrase “independent internal investigation” seems an apparent contradiction in terms, if not an actual or perceived conflict of interest. How “independent” is any investigation if it is conducted or controlled by the same company that is accused of the alleged wrongdoing? The critical and, indeed, significant question becomes: How can a corporation conduct an internal investigation whose results will be accepted as independent and credible by the public, shareholders, the financial community, putative victims and,
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or email@example.com
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.