Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
The Role of Trial Counsel In Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Three Questions to Keep in Mind
By David M. Siegel
Whether the constitutional guarantee of effective assistance of counsel is meaningful ultimately depends on the work of criminal defense lawyers at two different times: when initially representing a defendant and later when that former client claims ineffective assistance of counsel (IAC). Even when other participants in the system fail to ensure effectiveness of counsel, it is the criminal defense lawyer’s deficiency that matters.1 This responsibility, to our clients and to the criminal justice system, can produce conflicting ethical obligations even for diligent counsel faced with an IAC claim. There are an infinite variety of ways to be ineffective, but there are three key points at which the conscientious lawyer can act to ensure he or she renders effective assistance consistent with his or her ethical obligations, and that the former client’s rights to effective assistance are protected. Counsel should consider these three questions:
- Before the engagement: Are you qualified to comp
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or email@example.com
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.