Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
Challenging The President's Warrantless Wiretapping
By Gerald F. Uelmen
The revelation that President George W. Bush authorized an extensive program of warrantless wiretapping of suspected al-Queda operatives in the United States after the 9/11 attack puts American criminal defense lawyers on the front line in challenging one of the most arrogant abuses of presidential power in our history. A good starting point if you have a client who may have been subjected to such wiretaps is to do precisely what the lawyers representing Robert Plamondon did in United States v. U. S. District Court, 407 U.S. 302 (1972): file a motion to compel the government to disclose electronic surveillance information, and conduct a hearing to determine whether any such information tainted the evidence upon which the charges are based. If the government refuses to make such disclosure, the case should be dismissed. If surveillance is disclosed which was conducted without a warrant, as in United States v. U. S. District Court, you should get the same result that Robert Plamondon got
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or email@example.com
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.