Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
An Overview of the Ethical Issues Created by Problem-Solving Courts And the Mentally Ill Client
By Steven N. Yermish
The NACDL Task Force Issues a Report and Calls for Reform
As a consequence of the large proportion of defendants having drug abuse or mental illness issues, courts in many jurisdictions over the last 20 years have established specialty or community courts.1 The first of these was the drug court in Miami, Fla., which was created in 1989. These courts were created in response to findings that drugs and drug-related crime account for a substantial percentage of the caseload in state criminal courts today.2
These problem-solving courts adopt a therapeutic approach, and are specifically designed to provide a rehabilitative or treatment alternative to the traditional adversarial model of the criminal court.3 As a result, the function of defense counsel in these courts has changed to one in which the attorney is expected to take a “best interests of the client” approach and cooperate with the court. Concomitantly, zealous, adversarial advocacy is discouraged. This representation model compromi
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or email@example.com
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.