Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
Arguments Against the Open Inquiry Method of Jury Selection
By Kim Freter
The “open inquiry” method of jury selection should be a tactic of last resort because it fails to effectively assist in the selection of a jury that is defense-oriented or at least neutral. It is untenable and implausible in all but a handful of cases. Moreover, this method could serve to undermine a defense attorney’s credibility and ability to sell the theory of the case.
Relevance of Racial, Gender, or Ethnic Diversity in a Criminal Jury
“Open inquiry” begins with the premise that attorneys should take steps to obtain a diverse jury. It is true that society at large may have an interest in a jury composed of members from different races, ethnicities, and genders. A criminal defendant, however, seeks only a jury that will find in his favor irrespective of the jury’s diversity. Thus, a defense attorney’s goal should be to select a jury that will vote in favor of the defendant, regardless of the jury’s racial, ethnic, or gender makeup. Defense lawyers want jurors who believe all police
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or firstname.lastname@example.org
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.