Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
Reflections on Guns And Jury Nullification And Jury Nullification
By Frederic Block
I had the pleasure of being a panel member on sentencing issues at NACDL’s seminar in Aspen this past January. After the meeting, Norman Reimer, the association’s executive director, told me that a future issue of The Champion would be devoted to jury issues and asked whether I would be willing to contribute an article recounting any experiences I might have encountered as a federal district court judge for the Eastern District of New York where I suspected that jury nullification was at play. I immediately thought of two recent back-to-back acquittals in felon-in-possession gun cases, and said I would.
The Trial of a Felon- In-Possession Case
Felon-in-possession cases are perhaps the simplest cases coming before a federal district court. Certainly, they require the simplest charge: all that is needed is for the jury to determine whether the defendant was previously convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment for more than one year, whether the defendant knowingly and intentionally p
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or email@example.com
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.