Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
Fourth Circuit upholds wire fraud conviction based on scheme to evade foreign tax
By Kathryn Keneally
White-Collar Crime columns.
Fourth Circuit upholds wire fraud conviction based on a scheme to evade foreign tax
A long-standing common law principle known as the “revenue rule” holds that the courts of the United States generally are not required to recognize or to enforce foreign tax judgments. In two opinions decided within a few months of one another, the First Circuit held that the revenue rule prevented the use of the federal mail and wire fraud statutes to prosecute a scheme to evade Canadian excise taxes, while in direct contradiction the Second Circuit held that a nearly identical scheme could form the basis of a wire fraud predicate to uphold a conviction under the federal money laundering statute.1
In a recent en banc decision, the Fourth Circuit has joined the Second Circuit in upholding convictions under the wire fraud statute based on a scheme to evade Canadian taxes in connection with the importation and sale of liquor.2
The prosecution in United States v. Pasquantino involved a fairly straightforwar
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or email@example.com
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.