The Champion

September/October 2003 , Page 42 

Search the Champion Looking for something specific?

Preview of Member Only Content

For full access: login or Become a Member Join Now

Third party guilt: The crucial role of defense theory instructions

By Thomas Lundy

Read more Jury Instruction columns.

When the defense relies on a theory of third party guilt, the jury may improperly view the trial as a question of whether or not the third party has been proven guilty. Hence, it is crucial that the instructions caution the jurors against shifting the burden of proof to the defendant.

Right of the accused to rely on third party guilt as a defense theory and to present evidence of third party guilt

Evidence that another person committed the charged crime is “generally recognized as relevant evidence under fundamental standards.” Larimore v. State, 877 S.W.2d 570, 575 (Ariz. 1994) ; see also United States v. Stevens, 935 F.2d 1380, 1401-03 (3rd Cir. 1991); United States v. Armstrong, 621 F.2d 951, 953 (9th Cir. 1980); U.S. v. Calle, 822 F.2d 1016, 1021 (11th Cir. 1987) (third party guilt is substantive defense which cannot be limited by trial court pursuant to rules governing impeachment); People v. Edelbacher, 47 Cal.3d 983, 1017; 254 Cal.Rptr.586 (1989); People v.

Want to read more?

The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.

NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
login

Not a member? Join now.
Join Now
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.

See what NACDL members say about us.

To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.

  • Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or idominguez@nacdl.org
  • Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.

In This Section

Advertisement Advertise with Us
ad