Preview of Member Only Content
For full access:
or Become a Member 
Informal Opinion
By Robert Perske
Read more
Informal Opinion columns.
Gisli Gudjonsson’s Penchant for Corroboration
Today, instructors in police academies never cease to hammer into the
heads of recruit officers the proper steps needed for a successful
criminal investigation.
- Get evidence.
- Get evidence.
- Get evidence.
- Get evidence.
- Try for a confession.
- Do everything possible to corroborate a confession.
Some investigators — but not all — fail to follow these steps with
people who have intellectual disabilities. Some — but not all — misread
the defendant’s differences and come to believe, really believe, that
they “have the man.” Some — but not all — question suspects relentlessly
for long hours until a confession is squeezed out of them. They do it
even though no physical or witness evidence connects the person with a
disability to the crime. Fortunately, in the last 10 years, false
confessions have been exposed to the light of day as never before.
America’s Heightening Awareness of Actual Innocence
Law professor Steven Drizin and crimin
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.

Not a member? Join now.

Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or idominguez@nacdl.org
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.