The NACDL Foundation for Criminal Justice preserves and promotes the core values of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and the American criminal justice system.
Support Us NowYolando Blount
Yolando Blount, now 41, has served 10 years of a 27-year sentence that she received in 2013 for her involvement in a non-violent, run-of-the-mill tax return scheme in the Middle District of Georgia. Ms. Blount pled guilty based on a sentencing analysis provided by the Probation Department to her counsel, pre-plea, indicating a potential sentence of between six to seven years. Following Ms. Blount’s plea to a plea agreement in which she waived her right to challenge any guideline enhancements at sentencing and on appeal, however, the government advocated a host of enhancements not previously previewed with Ms. Blount. The “piling on” of guideline enhancements is a tactic the government uses to punish people for exercising their right to trial. Essentially, Ms. Blount received a “trial penalty,” without ever having had the benefit of a trial. A survivor of extreme trauma and abuse and despite entering prison with what appeared to her to be a life sentence to her at the time, Ms. Blount’s prison record has been exemplary. She has zero serious disciplinary infractions and has used every opportunity to work and program. She has an excellent release plan with her mother and brother and extended family
Jose DeLaCruz is serving a mandatory Life sentence for a drug offense - a statutory sentence that, if he were sentenced today, would be much lower because of changes in the law. Initially facing a ten-year mandatory minimum sentence, the government decided to file notices to enhance Mr. DeLaCruz’s sentence because of prior convictions (one for simple possession, and the other for delivery of 0.5 grams of cocaine). On the day of trial, the government offered to dismiss the enhancements, which carried the mandatory Life sentence, if Mr. DeLaCruz would relinquish his constitutional right to trial and instead plead guilty. Because Mr. DeLaCruz insisted on proceeding to trial, upon conviction the court had no alternative but to impose a Life sentence. Since he has been in custody, Mr. DeLaCruz has had an exemplary prison record. He serves as a Suicide Watch Inmate Companion, assisting others who are struggling with their mental health. He has an incredible support network made up of friends and family, and has an excellent release plan.
Kelvin Johnson has served over eleven years of what was originally a life sentence imposed after a guilty plea for his non-violent role in a drug conspiracy. The sentence was driven by the government’s “piling on” of guideline enhancements to ensure Mr. Johnson’s guilty plea and cooperation. Nonetheless, at sentencing he was initially sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. While his sentence has since been reduced to 288 months as a result of guideline changes, he deserves to be released to his loving family primarily due to several debilitating medical conditions. Born with severe scoliosis, he has endured painful surgeries and years of cruel childhood teasing. Prior to his arrest, he was the primary caregiver to his cancer-stricken father in his final years. Mr. Johnson’s prison record has been exemplary, completing over 50 education courses, regularly attending bible study, and befriending and mentoring new inmates. He has a solid release plan that would return him to his small, tight-knit Georgia community where his family and friends love and miss him dearly and are ready to undertake his care.
Misty Munsey Killian, 44, is in her seventh year of a nineteen-year sentence for methamphetamine distribution. In the grip of a severe addiction herself, Ms. Munsey-Killian was simply trying to fund her habit. Her lengthy sentence was driven by the prosecutor’s decision to threaten her with a mandatory life sentence after trial if she did not accept a plea deal to a lengthy term - a classic example of the government wielding the “trial penalty” to achieve draconian sentences. Today, with changes wrought by statute, courts and charging practices, she would likely receive a sentence that she has already served. Ms. Munsey-Killian has an exemplary prison record, and an excellent release plan with family members who have remained close throughout her incarceration.
Alejandro Casillas Prieto, 49 years old, is serving a life sentence for a non-violent drug offense. Since his incarceration in 2010, Mr. Prieto has demonstrated remarkable rehabilitation, with zero incidents of discipline and an outstanding work and educational history. Mr. Prieto was offered as little as two years in prison if he pled guilty. However, due in part to a misunderstanding of the sentence he would almost certainly get if convicted, he exercised his constitutional right to have a trial. On July 12, 2012, despite having no prior criminal history, he was sentenced to life in prison.
At the age of 18, Darius Reaux, along with three other young men, committed a series of armed robberies. However, if sentenced today for the same offenses, he would not be sentenced to his current lengthy term of imprisonment. Today, Mr. Reaux is far from the troubled teenager he was at the time of his offenses. Mr. Reaux has taken full advantage of every opportunity provided to him in prison, and quickly obtained his GED and completed an intensive drug treatment program. After ten years of imprisonment, today Mr. Reaux is a mature, thoughtful young man who is a leader and mentor in the prison, has a spotless record of discipline, and is an exceptional employee in UNICOR.
Angela Reynolds is in her seventh year of a 23-year sentence she received in the Northern District of Texas for her role in a methamphetamine distribution scheme. Although she did not go to trial, she effectively received a post-trial sentence because at her sentencing, using a typical method for creating a trial penalty, the government advocated for every possible sentencing guideline enhancement. Ms. Reynolds has an exemplary prison record, during which she has trained guide dogs and worked in an HVAC apprenticeship. She has an excellent release plan with family and a supportive faith community.
Kimberly Robinson, now 63 has served 10 years of a 24-year sentence that she received in 2015 for her involvement in a first-time, non-violent, based on her role as a low level drug courier. Ms. Robinson was never informed of the fact that her lawyer had plea discussions with the government. Without this knowledge or opportunity to pursue plea discussions, Ms. Robinson elected to exercise her right to trial and received a sentence substantially higher than the terms of the plea agreement being discussed. Her sentence was also substantially higher than the sentences of her co-defendants – all equally or more culpable than her – and all of whom have now been released from prison. Essentially, Ms. Robinson received a “trial penalty,” without ever having the benefit of participating in plea discussions. Ms. Robinson’s prison conduct has been exemplary. She has zero disciplinary infractions and has completed in a wide variety of work and educational programs. She has a strong release plan with her son in Florida.
Mohamed Taher, 42, has served almost nine years of a 25-year sentence he received in 2014 for his unarmed, non-violent role in a marijuana importation and distribution conspiracy in the Western District of New York. When he rejected a plea offer to ten years, the government filed a superseding indictment carrying a mandatory minimum penalty of 22 years. Today, as a result of society’s changing views on the propriety of criminalizing marijuana, as well as enlightened federal charging policies, Mr. Taher’s likely prison sentence in this case would be less than half the time he has already served. Mr. Taher has an excellent release plan, with a large network of supportive family and friends and a solid job offer. He yearns to be reunited with his three children.
Kelli Caron is in her seventh year of a 14-year sentence she received for her non-violent, low-level role in a meth distribution conspiracy. Her participation was driven by her own meth addiction. After the prosecutor threatened her with a mandatory life sentence through the filing of a recidivist enhancement notice, Ms. Caron accepted a plea deal that would keep her incarcerated until the age of 43, robbing her of her child-bearing years. If sentenced today, Ms. Caron would receive a sentence that would be one quarter of her current one. Ms. Caron has been an exemplary prisoner. Sentenced to serve a concurrent sentence in state prison for a probation violation (related to her federal case), she enrolled in college, learned trades and took care of sick prisoners. Her extraordinary record earned her the first Minnesota state-level commutation to an incarcerated person in 28 years, granted by Minnesota Governor Tim Walz in 2020.
Karin Condon, 63, has served almost 9 years of a 15-year sentence for her entirely nonviolent and unarmed role as a taxi-driver in a drug distribution scheme in the District of North Dakota - a role she assumed to support her own addiction. Her sentence was driven by the government’s decision to file notices of recidivist enhancements in her case. Such recidivist enhancements were intended by Congress to ensure that the most reprehensible of drug dealers were put behind bars for a long time. Instead, they have been used all too often to incarcerate low-level drug addicts on sentences that far exceed any public safety or punishment imperatives. Ms. Condon’s case is one such case. In sentencing her on her guilty plea, the court used the life sentence as a reference and noted that 15 years was the lowest sentence he had ever imposed on someone facing a mandatory life sentence. Her judge also noted that “her entire criminal history is the result of her addiction. She poses no threat of harm to others, or herself.” Ms. Condon would not face a life sentence today, and her plea-bargaining (and sentencing) landscape would be significantly more lenient. Ms. Condon has an exemplary prison record and a solid release plan.
John K. Caylor is a 54-year-old man who has served over 20 years in prison for a non-violent drug offense. Rejecting an offer of 15 years, he went to trial and was sentenced to life in prison. This was later reduced to 30 years. Mr. Caylor has demonstrated remarkable rehabilitation, with excellent personal conduct in prison and a history of employment through UNICOR. Despite the fact that he was not a leader of the drug conspiracy, Mr. Caylor will soon be the only remaining codefendant in prison. Mr. Caylor’s only son suffers from end stage renal failure and is in desperate need of a kidney transplant. Mr. Caylor seeks to be released so that he may try to become a kidney donor and to provide much-needed emotional support and care to his son. Based on his length of sentence served and his demonstrated rehabilitation, Mr. Caylor is deserving of clemency.
Betty Lee Jenkins,62 years old, has served most of her 10.5-year sentence for distribution of medical marijuana in the State of Michigan. She was offered a plea offer with a cap of five years prior to her federal trial on conduct that was legal at the state level but remained criminalized at the federal level. Today, under more enlightened federal prosecution practices, Ms. Jenkins, a single mother of five, would not even be charged. She has had a spotless disciplinary record in prison and run several programs for her fellow prisoners, including as a wellness tutor and fitness trainer. She has an excellent release plan with her sister in Canada and plans to work as a dog trainer and dog groomer. She loves animals.
Jackie Laster has served over six years of her 188-month sentence imposed for low-level, non-violent, unarmed role in a street crack distribution conspiracy. She pled to avoid a much higher penalty after trial, but then at sentencing, the government advocated for a series of enhancements that had never been previewed with Ms. Laster during the plea-bargaining process. In effect, she faced the post-trial sentence without the benefit of a trial. Her prison record has been exemplary. She completed a housekeeping apprenticeship and was selected as a mentor to new inmates at her prison camp. Upon release, Ms. Laster is planning on living with her older sister, who is currently caring for Ms. Laster’s son.
Brent Maurstad is in his 8th year of a 16.5-year sentence imposed for his low-level, non-violent role in a conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. A star athlete in high school and vice president of his senior class, his life unraveled because of a debilitating addiction to methamphetamine that began in his 20s. His sentence was driven by the government’s decision to threaten him with a mandatory life sentence after trial. The statute the government used was intended by Congress to ensure that the most reprehensible of drug dealers were put behind bars for a long time. Instead, they have been used all too often to incarcerate low-level drug addicts on sentences that far exceed any public safety or punishment imperatives. Mr. Maurstad’s case is one such case. In sentencing him on his guilty plea, the court used the life sentence as a reference. Mr. Maurstad would not face a life sentence today, and his charging, plea-bargaining and sentencing landscapes would be significantly more lenient. Mr. Maurstad has a spotless record in prison, where he competed two 2,000-hour apprenticeships in landscaping, and also obtained an undergraduate university certificate in horticulture. He has a solid release plan in the home he still owns in Grand Forks, blocks from his elderly mobility-challenged mother, and a job in a tree-service business.
Benton Miley is a 70-year-old U.S. Navy veteran who has served over 29 years in prison for drug-related offenses. Mr. Miley has worked for UNICOR and in various positions within the BOP for many years and has not had any disciplinary incidents in all his years of incarceration. Mr. Miley is now in poor health due to complications from colon cancer, and he suffers from periodontal disease and severe abdominal and joint pain. In addition, due to his compromised immune system, he remains at risk of suffering from severe illness if he were to contract COVID-19. Based on his length of sentence served and his demonstrated rehabilitation, Mr. Miley is deserving of clemency.
Jason Payne has served 95 months of a 140-month sentence he received for his low-level, non-violent and unarmed role in a drug distribution scheme. His long sentence was driven by the government’s threat to file a notice relating to two prior minor drug convictions that would have subjected him to a mandatory minimum sentence of life. Mr. Payne had no choice but to accept this lengthy sentence and the judge imposed it without any departure, knowing that it saved Mr. Payne from a life sentence. Mr. Payne has a pristine disciplinary record and was released under the CARES Act at the beginning of this year. He works as a semi-truck driver and is devoting all his spare time to reconnecting with his children, family members and friends.
Brian Lakeith Rowe was sentenced to 30 years in 2010 for a first-time, non-violent offense, based on his role as a driver in a cocaine distribution scheme. He briefly participated in the scheme when he could not find work during the financial crisis, but exited shortly thereafter and by the time of his arrest, he was leading a happy and successful life in New York. Rowe elected to exercise his right to a trial, receiving a sentence substantially higher than eight of nine co-defendants — all more culpable than him, and all but one have been released from prison. Rowe’s prison conduct has been outstanding. He has zero disciplinary infractions and is pursuing his Associate’s Degree in Information Technology. He has a strong release plan with family in New York.
Luke Scarmazzo has served more than 12 years of a 22-year sentence. The co-defendants who pled guilty received sentences ranging from probation to one year of incarceration. Mr. Scarmazzo has been incarcerated for over a decade following a conviction for operating a medical marijuana dispensary which was legal under California law. Mr. Scarmazzo and one co-defendant (of seven) were charged under the continuing criminal enterprise statute and remain the only two convicted. As the judge noted at sentencing, Mr. Scarmazzo’s decision to go to trial was conscious and political: he genuinely believed that his delivery of marijuana for medicinal reasons was legal under prevailing law (just like John Paul Zenger in his 1735 trial believed that it was legal to recount truthful facts about the governor of New York). Mr. Scarmazzo has completed numerous classes and received an Associate's Degree.
First-time offender Kanya Tirado was sentenced to a mandatory minimum of ten years for her role as courier in a cocaine distribution scheme. Her conduct was unarmed and entirely nonviolent. Rejecting offers that would have had her serve little to no prison time if she cooperated against others, Ms. Tirado exercised her right to trial. She was convicted and the court had no choice but to impose the mandatory minimum sentence. Ms. Tirado, who was orphaned in her teens when both her parents died of AIDS, had five children ranging in age from 8 to 19 when she was incarcerated. She was released on home confinement under the CARES Act in 2021, works full-time and spends every spare minute with her children.
Barbara Williams, 47, has served 7 years of a 16-year sentence she received from her low-level, non-violent role in a drug distribution scheme in the District of North Dakota - which itself was driven by her drug addiction and experience of abuse in her personal history. Her sentence was dictated by the government’s decision to file notices of recidivist enhancements in her case. Such recidivist enhancements were intended by Congress to ensure that the most reprehensible of drug dealers were put behind bars for a long time. Instead, they have been used all too often to incarcerate low-level drug addicts on sentences that far exceed any public safety or punishment imperatives. Ms. Willaims’s case is one such case. In sentencing her on her guilty plea, the court used the life sentence as a reference to decide her lengthy sentence. Today, that frame would significantly lower, and her sentence would be proportionately lower. She has already served the likely sentence she would receive today. Ms. Williams has an exemplary prison record and an excellent release plan.