Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
By Jack King
NACDL News columns.
Wiretap Cases Withstanding DOJ Challenges
First the opinion was attacked, and then the attacks focused on the judge. But U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor’s Aug. 17 decision in American Civil Liberties Union, et al. v. National Security Agency, et al. (E.D. Mich., No. 06-CV-10204), which declared the Bush Administration’s “terrorist surveillance program” illegal on statutory, First Amendment, and Fourth Amendment grounds, is considered a blow to the wiretap program.
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is a plaintiff in the suit. Other plaintiffs include the Michigan ACLU, the national and Michigan offices of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, and Greenpeace. Individual plaintiffs include journalist Christopher Hitchens and James Bamford, author of The Puzzle Palace, an exposé of the NSA; and NACDL members Nancy Hollander, William Swor and Joshua Dratel, who have active terrorism-related cases. Taylor cited their declarations filed with the complaint as evid
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or email@example.com
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.