Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
United States v. Skinner: Using a Cell Phone Is Not A Consent to Search
By Daniel K. Gelb
On Aug. 14, 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued the opinion in United States v. Skinner.1 In Skinner, federal Drug Enforcement Administration agents seized data maintained by a cell phone service provider in an effort to derive as closely as possible the real-time geographical information residing on defendant Melvin Skinner’s “pay-as-you-go” mobile phone.2 The “cell tower” data was subsequently used to establish Skinner’s location as he transported drugs interstate on public roadways. DEA agents tracked the cell phone they learned was associated with Skinner, locating the device’s signal at a rest stop. Soon thereafter, law enforcement officials encountered a motorhome filled with over 1,100 pounds of marijuana. After litigating the merits of the seizure at some length, the trial court denied Skinner’s motion to suppress the government’s search of the motorhome, eventually resulting in a conviction for drug trafficking and conspiracy to commit mon
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or email@example.com
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.