Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
The Willfulness Element of a False Statement Charge
By Paul Mogin
Defense lawyers and civil liberties lawyers have long recognized the risk of unfairness and overreaching posed by 18 U.S.C. § 1001, the federal false statement statute.1 Recently, however, concern about § 1001 has surfaced in other quarters as well. Two years ago, Judge Brett Kavanaugh of the D.C. Circuit described the statute as “ever-metastasizing” and warned that “§ 1001 prosecutions can pose a risk of abuse and injustice.”2 Earlier this year, Judge Grady Jolly of the Fifth Circuit protested that his colleagues had “taken leave of a common sense application of the law”3 in sustaining a false statement conviction, and former Deputy Assistant Attorney General Stephen Saltzburg declared that “[t]here is no statute out there that’s more pernicious.”4
A person violates § 1001 if, “in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the government of the United States,” he “knowingly and willfully” conceals a material fact by a “trick,
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or email@example.com
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.