Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
Minorities Still Burdened With Mandatory Minimum Sentences (Informal Opinion)
By Jack King
Informal Opinion columns.
For more than two decades, NACDL has opposed mandatory minimum sentences. The U.S. Sentencing Commission’s comprehensive report on mandatory minimum sentences, released on October 31, 2011, shows that statutory mandatory minimum penalties continue to “apply too broadly, are set too high, or both, to warrant the prescribed minimum penalty for the full range of offenders who could be prosecuted under the particular criminal statute.” Nearly three out of four federal inmates serving a mandatory minimum sentence are Black or Hispanic. Moreover, the fixed penalties are costly to society at large. The report acknowledges that mandatory minimums have been a major factor in the tripling of the federal prison population over the past 20 years.
NACDL has long maintained that the goals of sentencing — retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation — are never served by inflexible and frequently disproportionate mandatory minimum penalties. Mandatory minimums for
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or email@example.com
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.