Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
Exculpatory Evidence Getting It and Using It
By Michael A. Collora, William A. Haddad
Recent incidents regarding the failure of prosecutors to turn over exculpatory evidence resulted in the dismissal of a U.S. senator’s conviction (United States v. Stevens),1 a remand by the Supreme Court in a death penalty case for a potential resentencing (Cone v. Bell),2 voluntary dismissal of a gun charge carrying a 15-year mandatory minimum sentence (United States v. Jones),3 and, but for an acquittal, the potential dismissal of a long-running federal prosecution in Montana for environmental prosecution (United States v. W.R. Grace).4 These cases present a common theme — the prosecutors failed to turn over exculpatory evidence primarily related to impeachment, or in the sentencing case, militating circumstances involving mental outlook and drug use just prior to the crime. In all four cases, prosecutors drew the ire of the presiding trial judge for their lack of attention to the constitutional rights of defendants. In the Stevens case, the judge found the government’s discovery vio
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or email@example.com
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.