The Champion


Cumulative Article Index


H

Habeas Corpus.

Hafetz, Frederick P.

Hagin, Leslie J.

Halbrook, Stephen P.

Hall, John Wesley, Jr.

Halpern, Sheldon.

Halstead, John R.

Hammond, Larry A.

Handwriting analysis.

Hansen, Hugh J., Ph.D.

Hansen, Richard

Harris, G. Christian.

Harris, David A.

Hartman, Marshall

Harvey, Bruce S.

Hatter, Terry

Heeney, Thomas L.

Heinlen, James H.

Heller, Kevin Jon

Helmer, William J.

Hennenberg, Michael C.

Henning, Peter J.

Herman, G. Nicholas.

Hernandez, Paul

Herzog, Paul F.

Hill, Wayne N., Sr.

Hillenbrand, Bernard F.

Hingson, John Henry, III.

Hirsch, Milton.

Hirschhorn, Robert B.

Hlastala, Michael P., Ph.D.

Hoelter, Herbert J.

Holland, Cheryl.

Hollander, Nancy.

Homola, James R.

Homan, Kimberly

Homicide. See also: Death penalty.

Horn, Lawrence S.

Houlihan, Edith Georgi

Houser, Ronald E.

Howard, David A.

Howson, Roy N.

Hrones, Stephen.

Hudsmith, Rebecca L.

Hudson, James.

Hudson, Natalie E.

Hume, David N., Ph.D.

Hupy, Michael F.

Hurley, Michelle S.C.

Hutton, Chris.

Hypnosis.


I

Identifications.

  • Koosed, Capital Cases--Dead Wrong: Mistaken Indentifications and Capital Prosecutions,June 1989 at 42.
  • Meshbesher, Identification Issues in the '90s, 1990 NACDL MIDYEAR MEETING SEM. MAT'LS III (collected motions) (119 pp.).
  • Brigham, Disputed Eyewitness Investigations: Can Experts Help?, June 1989 at 10.
  • Krischer & Salnick, Prearrest Identification, June 1989 at 19.
  • Siegel, New Fingerprint Process May Aid Criminal Investigation, Jan./Feb. 1984 at 36.
  • Rissler, The Role of Defense Counsel at Lineups, Apr./May, 1980 at 12.
  • Blinder, Exposing the Fallibility of the Eyewitness, Apr. 1986 at 14.

Immigration.

  • Maynard, William R., Deportation: An Immigration Law Primer for the Criminal Defense Lawyer, June 1999 at 12.
  • [Featured Online]
  • Kurzban, Ira J., The Immigration Act of 1990, April 1991 at 5.
  • Converse, Book Review, Aug. 1990 at 65 (reviewing I. KURZBAN, KURZBAN'S IMMIGRATION LAW SOURCEBOOK (1990)).
  • Snure, Book Review, Apr. 1985 at 18 (reviewing D. KESSELBRENNER & L. ROSENBERG, IMMIGRATION LAW AND CRIMES (1984)).
  • Vomacka, Immigration Considerations for the Criminal Defense Lawyer (pts. 1 & 2) Apr. 1982 at 9, id., May 1982 at 4.
  • Ridgeway, The Sanctuary Indictments: Shelter Skelter, Apr. 1985 at 16.
  • Larson & Riordan, Sanctuary: How to Defend Those Who Protect Their Brothers and Sisters,Apr. 1985 at 6.
  • Hollander & Converse, Immigration Implications for the Alien Defendant (pts. 1 & 2), May 1986 at 29, June 1986 at 16.
  • Converse, Keeping Dorothy in Kansas After Ozkok: New Strategies for DefendingNon-Citizens, Mar. 1989 at 8.

Immunity.

  • Taylor, Defense Witness Immunity, Dec. 1983 at 28.
  • Taylor, Witness Immunity: A Review, Nov. 1983 at 13.

Imwinkelried, Edward J.

  • Imwinkelried, Edward J., Daubert Revisited: Disturbing Implications, May 1998 at 18.
  • [Featured Online]
  • Imwinkelried, Edward J., Evidence Law: Uncertainty of Scientific Enterprise, July 1996 at 12.
  • Imwinkelried, Edward J. and Scofield, Robert G., Attacking The Weight Of The Prosecution's Scientific Evidence, April 1992 at 6.
  • Imwinkelreid, Edward J, Uncharged Misconduct Evidence (Part 1), December 1993 at 12.
  • Imwinkelried, Edward J., Uncharged Misconduct Evidence (Part 2), Jan./Feb. 1994 at 20.
  • Imwinkelried, Recent Developments in Forensic Evidence: More Good News, Aug. 1990 at 8.
  • Imwinkelried, Evidentiary Objections and Motions, Dec. 1989 at 7.
  • Imwinkelried, The Use of Learned Scientific Treatises Under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(18), Dec. 1980 at 6.
  • Imwinkelried, Scientific Evidence: Trace Metal Detection Technique Evidence, July 1981 at 2.
  • Imwinkelried, Scientific Evidence: Electrophoresis in Blood Testing, Sept./Oct. 1981 at 2.
  • Imwinkelried, The Constitutionality of Introducing Evaluative Laboratory Reports (pts. 1 & 2), June 1982 at 4, id., July 1982 at 3.
  • Imwinkelried, Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, Sept./Oct. 1982 at 10.
  • Martinez & Imwinkelried, Scientific Evidence: The Application of the Frye Test to Non-Instrumental Scientific Techniques, Dec. 1982 at 10.
  • Imwinkelried, Demeanor Impeachment: Law and Tactics (pts. 1 & 2), May 1986 at 19, June 1986 at 6.
  • Konkel & Imwinkelried, The Due Process Implications of Unnecessary Destructive Scientific Tests, May 1983 at 6.
  • Imwinkelried, Evidence Law and Tactics: Jurors Expect Scientific Testimony at Trials (pts. 1 & 2) Mar. 1982 at 5, id., Apr. 1982 at 3.
  • Imwinkelried, Forensic Hair Analysis (pts. 1 & 2), Dec. 1981 at 5, id., Jan./Feb. 1982 at 4.
  • Imwinkelried, The Forensic Uses of the Scanning Electron Microscope, Mar. 1981 at 2.
  • Bleser & Imwinkelried, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), Nov. 1983 at 6.
  • Imwinkelried, Genetic Marker Tests: Methods and Evidentiary Limitations (pts. 1 & 2), Nov. 1986 at 22, id., Dec. 1986 at 14.
  • Imwinkelried, Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979): Re-opening Pandora's Box in Drug Prosecutions (pts. 1 & 2), Dec. 1984 at 8, Jan./Feb. 1985 at 6.
  • Imwinkelried, Limiting Instructions On Uncharged Misconduct Evidence: The Last Line of Defense Against Jury Misuse of the Evidence, March 1986 at 6.
  • Imwinkelried, Methods of Attacking Scientific Evidence: Admissibility Attacks in General(pts. 1 & 2), July 1983 at 6, Aug. 1983 at 22.
  • Imwinkelried, New Techniques for Visualizing Latent Fingerprint Impressions: A Two-Edged Sword, Nov. 1985 at 18.
  • Imwinkelried, The Plan Theory for Admitting Evidence of the Defendant's Uncharged Crimes(pts. 1 & 2), July 1985 at 6 (Part I: Misapplications of the Plan Theory), Aug. 1985 at 22 (Part II: Pervasive Errors in Uncharged Misconduct Evidence).
  • Imwinkelried, A Potpourri of Forensic Science, Jan./Feb. 1984 at 19.
  • Imwinkelried, The Procedure for Determining the Preliminary Facts Conditioning the Admissibility of Scientific Evidence: A Call for theAmendment of Federal Rule of Evidence 901 (pts. 1 & 2), June 1984 at 20, July 1984 at 10.
  • Cade & Imwinkelried, Rape Trauma Syndrome Evidence, Mar. 1983 at 2.
  • Imwinkelried & Schwed, The Reform of Limiting Instructions on Uncharged Misconduct Evidence: A Case Study in the Drafting of Comprehensible Jury Instructions, Mar. 1987 at 6.
  • Imwinkelried, The Second Revolution: Federal Rule of Evidence 402 and Common-Law Exceptions to Admissibility (pts. 1, 2 & 3), Aug 1987 at 16; Sept./Oct. 1987 at 16; Nov. 1987 at 13.
  • Imwinkelried, The Standard for Admitting Scientific Evidence: The Frye Test in Flux, May 1981 at 3.
  • Imwinkelried, Immunoassay Drug Testing, Aug. 1988 at 10.
  • Imwinkelried, Recent Developments in Forensic Science: The Good News, Dec. 1988 at 14.
  • Imwinkelried, Edward J., The Meaning Of 'Facts Or Data' In Federal Rule Of Evidence 703, The Significance Of The Supreme Court's Decision To Rely On Federal Rule 702 In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., March 1995 at 4.

Indigent Defense.

  • Petterson, Paul S.Indigent Defense: Recent Developments, August 1999 at 57. [Featured Online]
  • Petterson, Paul S.Indigent Defense, July 1999 at 48. [Featured Online]
  • Matthewman, William D. Crisis in the Criminal Justice Act, April 1999 at 31.
  • Reno, Janet, Six Building Blocks for Indigent Defense, April 1999 at 28. [Featured Online]
  • MacCarthy, Terence, Unanimous Resolution, April 1999 at 20. [Featured Online]
  • Petterson, Paul S., CJA Funding -- This Time, April 1999 at 14. [Featured Online]
  • National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Indigent Defense Committee, Indigent Defense Handbook: A Manual for Obtaining Attorneys Fees and Costs for Supplemental Services and for Challenging State Assigned-Counsel Systems (1989).
  • LaFay, Laura Indigent Defense in Virginia: Poorest in Nation, May 1998 at 10.
  • [Featured Online]
  • Hall, Capital Cases--Compensating Capital Counsel in Federal Court, Aug. 1989 at 40
  • Monahan, Obtaining Funds for Experts in Indigent Cases, Aug. 1989 at 10.
  • Petterson, Paul S., FY 96-Better Late Than Never?, Jan./Feb. 1996 at 38.
  • Petterson, Paul S., Standards, Contracts & Professional Responsibility, July 1997 at 35.
  • Petterson, Paul S., Two Steps Forward, May 1996 at 49.
  • Petterson, Paul S., Can Beggars Be Choosers?, May 1995 at 50;
  • Petterson, Paul S., Disputed Requests For Appointed Counsel, March 1995 at 42;
  • Petterson, Paul S., Minnesota: A Judge John C. With Guts, June 1995 at 37;
  • Petterson, Paul S., NACDL Adopts Assigned Counsel Policies, Jan./Feb. 1995 at 18;
  • Petterson, Paul S., Save The Train, July 1995 at 44;
  • Petterson, Paul S., Stalled CJA Panel Rates Challenged In Maryland, April 1995 at 40;
  • Petterson, Paul S., Virginia: A Different John C., June 1995 at 37.
  • Petterson, Paul S., Virginia Fees Challenged, April 1995 at 40;
  • Petterson, Paul S., The Federal Judiciary: 'Champion' Of Indigent Defense?, Aug. 1994 at 29;
  • Petterson, Paul S., Help Wanted, Sept./Oct. 1994 at 39; Progress in Tennessee, Nov. 1994 at 40;
  • Petterson, Paul S., DNA Experts For Indigents, Dec. 1994 at 29.
  • Reno, Janet Legal Service for Poor Needs Vigilance, May 1998 at 32.
  • [Featured Online]
  • Schaeffer, Caherine L., Imputed Disqualification: Do Ethics Screens Adequately Shield Public Defenders from Conflicts of Interest? March 1997 at 29.
  • Salnick, Effective Counsel for the (Almost) Indigent: Making the Coffer Up, July 1989 at 6.
  • Schmerling, Attorney Fees in Civil Cases: How They Can Be Used to Argue for Fees in Indigent Criminal Cases, May 1983 at 13.
  • Tarantino, The .10% Solution, July 1988 at 33 (sample motion for appointment of chemical expert).

Informal Opinion.

  • White, Diarmuid, The Cooperation Market and the Co-Opting of Criminal Defense Attorneys, Sept/Oct 1999 at 65. [Featured Online]
  • Dow, William F. III, Detention Center TEGWAR, June 1999 at 66.
  • Amann, Diane Marie, Often-Asked Questions About the International Criminal Court, May 1999 at 31. [Featured Online]
  • Murray, Ken I Remember Gideon, April 1999 at 33.
  • Garber, Marc N. & Marino, Nina, Violations of Grand Jury Secrecy May Result in More Than Just Contempt, March 1999 at 21. [Featured Online]
  • Margolin, Ephraim, NACDL -- Why You Should Join a Club That Wants You as Its Member, Jan/Feb 1999 at 68.
  • Bowman, Frank, Against Impeachment: An Imagined Argument in the House Judiciary Committee, December 1998 at 49.
  • Goldberg, Jay, Your Clients' Brady-Giglio Rights Are Not Protected, Sept/Oct 1998 at 41.
  • Crooker, Constance Emerson, The 'S' Stands for Snitch, November 1997 at 29.
  • Gallup, J. William, A Criminal Lawyer and His Field of Dreams, March 1997 at 27.
  • Genego, William J., Imperfections of Justice: Capital Punishment Permits No Room For Error, May 1997 at 22. [Featured Online]
  • Goldberg, Jay, Does Anyone Really Understand the Role of Criminal Defense Counsel?, Sept./Oct. 1997 at 56.
  • Groom, David, The Executioner's Face Is Always Well-Hidden, Jan./Feb. 1998 at 29. [Featured Online]
  • Hall, John Wesley Jr., E-Mail and Confidentiality, June 1997 at 52.
  • Hirsch, Milton, Every Day is Judgement Day for the Constitution, July 1997 at 43.
  • Kelly, Cathy, What We Could Teach the Cops About Coercion, May 1998 at 34.
  • Martin, C. Rabin, Double Jeopardy and the Hung Jury Mistrial, June 1997 at 51.
  • Matthewman, William D., Racial Disparity on Federal Death Row, June 1996 at 38. [Featured Online]
  • Miller, Marvin D., Now is the Time for All Good People to Come to the Aid of Their Country, May 1996 at 57.
  • Mussomeli, Vito, The Day I Walked Away from a Bar Exam, April 1998 at 47.
  • Smith, David B., Some Reflections of Bailey vs. United States, April 1996 at 47.
  • Flannery, John, With Liberty And Justice For All?, April 1995 at 35.
  • Fleming, Lawrence J., Justice In Wonderland: 'A Very Grim Fairy Tail,' Jan./Feb. 1995 at 42.
  • Karnavas, Michael G., Defenders In Cambodia Make A Difference, April 1995 at 32.
  • Kent, Norman Elliott, The Medical Necessity Defense, Sept./Oct. 1995 at 39.
  • Kunstler, William M., 'The First Thing We Do, Let's Kill All The Lawyers', June 1995 at 47.
  • Lyman, R Morgan, Point-Checkpoint, Aug. 1995 at 47.
  • Martin, C. Rabon, Apology For A Veteran Drug Lawyer's No-Flip Policy, March 1995 at 29.
  • Rakoff, Jed S., A Criminal Defense Lawyer's Perspective On Professional Malaise, May 1995 at 35.
  • Terribile, Michael, The Judges I Respect, July 1995 at 42.
  • Brown, Raymond M., Adieu Nixon, A Dark Day Is Done!, Aug. 1994 at 33.
  • Epstein, Lloyd, Choice of Defense And The Attorney-Client Relationship: Whose Call Is It?, Nov. 1994 at 30.
  • Flannery, John P., Is Innocence Relevant To Execution? If Not, Isn't That Murder?, June 1994 at 46.
  • Freedman, Monroe,The Lawyer Who Hates Snitches, April 1994 at 25.
  • Kleiboemer, Axel, Some Doubts About Reasonable Doubt, July 1994 at 41.
  • Kunstler, William M., Reflections, May 1994 at 39.
  • Fleming, Lawrence J., The War On Crime -- The Domestic Vietnam, Sept/Oct 1993 at 33.
  • Hafetz, Frederick P., Lawyers Under Fire, June 1993 at 45.
  • Silverglate, Harvey, The Need For A Clean Sweep At The Department Of Justice, July 1993 at 33.
  • Stretton, Samuel C, Jan./Feb. 1992 at 25, March 1992 at 21, April 1992 at 33, May 1992 at 25, June 1992 at 31, July 1992 at 35, August 1992 at 39, November 1992 at 43.
  • Hall, John Wesley, Jr., Informal Opinion column, April 1991.
  • Stretton, Samuel C., Informal Opinion column, Jan./Feb. 1991, March 1991, May 1991, June 1991, July 1991, Aug. 1991, Sept./Oct. 1991, Nov. 1991, Dec. 1991.

Informants.

  • Fitzgerald, Dennis Inside the Informant File, May 1998 at 14.
  • [Featured Online]
  • Halstead & Cox, Disclosure of Confidential Informants, Mar. 1988 at 6.

In Limine Motions.

  • Margolin, Ephraim, In Limine Motions: Generalizing From The Particular, Jan./Feb. 1992 at 6.

In Open Court.

  • Rudolf, David S. & Widenhouse, Gordon, Continuing the Fight Against Prosecution by Snitch, Sept/Oct 1999 at 56.
  • Rudolf, David S. & Widenhouse, Gordon, Jury Instruction on Cross-Racial Identification; Witness Credibility: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back; Fodder in the Racial Profiling War, July 1999 at 69.
  • Rudolph, David and Gordon Widenhouse, Mezzanatto Clears Waivers, December 1998 at 31.
  • Rudolph, David and Gordon Widenhouse, Court Giveth & Taketh Away; A Boost for Careful Redaction; Circuits Split on Rule 403 & Sex Crimes, Sept/Oct 1998 at 37.
  • Rudolph, David and Gordon Widenhouse, Renewing the Challenge to Provisions Waiving the Right to Apeal, March 1998 at 51.
  • Rudolf, David S. and Gordon Widenhouse, Co-Defendant Confessions: When Redacting Simply Will Not Do, Sept./Oct. 1996 at 41.
  • Rudolf, David S. and Gordon Widenhouse, Daubert Redux: Oklahoma City Bombing Case, May 1997 at 24.
  • Rudolf, David S. and Gordon Widenhouse, Impeachment Rule 608 and Prior Bad Acts, May 1996 at 55.
  • Rudolf, David S. and Gordon Widenhouse, Reeling In Otherwise Relevant Evidence Due to Unfair Prejudice, March 1997 at 46.
  • Rudolf, David S. and Gordon Widenhouse, Smell Machine Bites Dust, July 1997 at 30.
  • Rudolf, David S. and Gordon Widenhouse, Supreme Court Expands Testimonial Privilege to Social Workers, July 1997 at 29.
  • Rudolf, David S. and Gordon Widenhouse, Avoiding The 'Bait And Switch' In Cooperation Agreements, Sep./Nov. 1995 at 42;
  • Rudolf, David S. and Gordon Widenhouse, 'A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Appeal,' May 1995 at 38;
  • Rudolf, David S. and Gordon Widenhouse, 'Daubert' Revisited, March 1995 at 27;
  • Rudolf, David S. and Gordon Widenhouse, In Search Of 'Brady,' Dec. 1995 at 35;
  • Rudolf, David S. and Gordon Widenhouse, Use Of Prior Consistent Statements Limited: Fool Me Once, Shame On You; Fool Me Twice [Or More] Shame On Me, March 1995 at 26.
  • Rudolf, David S. and Widenhouse, Gordon, Litigating The Admissibility Of Expert Testimony, Sept./Oct. 1994 at 36;
  • Rudolf, David S. and Widenhouse, Gordon, Litigating The Admissibility Of Informant's Statements, Dec. 1994 at 26.

International law.

  • Sims, John C. & Carter, Linda E. Representing Foreign Nationals: Emerging Importance of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations as a Defense Tool, Sept/Oct 1998 at 28.
  • [Featured Online]
  • Carpenter, Caymen Islands: No Longer a Sanctuary of Financial Security, Aug. 1987 at 19.
  • Ellis & Pisani, Book Review, May 1986 at 56 (reviewing INT'L ENFORCEMENT L. REP (B. Zagaris & J. Rosenthal eds.)).
  • Ellis & Pisani, Recent Developments in International Criminal Law, Nov. 1984 at 22.

Investigation.

  • Simon, Effective Use of an Investigator in Criminal Cases, Apr. 1990 at 8.


J

Jacobson, Jacqueline

  • Jacobson, Jacqueline, The Supreme Court Turns Insider Trading Inside Out, December 1997 at 12. [Featured Online]

Jaffe, Richard S.

  • Jaffe, The Diminished Capacity Defense, Apr. 1987 at 14.

Jason, Alexander

  • Jason, Alexander and Michael G. Karnavas, Courtroom Computer Animation and Simulation: Selling Your Case With High-Tech Persuasion, Jan./Feb. 1996 at 5.

Johnson, Robert C.

  • Johnson, Robert C., Preparing Demonstrative Evidence for Trial, March 1996 at 18.

Johnson, Knut S.

  • Johnson, Knut S., Juvenile Delinquents & Federal Law, May 1991 at 6.
  • Johnson, Knut S., Responding to Subpeonas: Constitutional and Practical Issues, Jan./Feb. 1997 at 10. [Featured Online]

Jopson, Jana.

  • Jopson, Sentencing Reform?, July 1987 at 6.

Jury.

  • Mickenberg, Book Review, June 1984 at 45 (reviewing NAT'L JURY PROJECT, JURYWORK: SYSTEMATIC TECHNIQUES (1983)).
  • Glynn, Book Review, July 1986 at 26 (reviewing S. SALTZBURG & H. PERLMAN, FEDERAL CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS (1985)).
  • Fahringer, Book Review, Mar. 1986 at 54 (reviewing R. MOSES, JURY ARGUMENT IN CRIMINAL CASES--A TRIAL LAWYER'S GUIDE (1985)).
  • Margolin, Book Review, Jan./Feb. 1986 at 43 (reviewing H. ACKLEY, CRIMINAL DEFENSE JURY INSTRUCTIONS (1984), errata, Aug. 1986 at 3 (letters to the Editor).
  • Sannito & Arnolds, Jury Study Results: Factors and Findings, Nov. 1982 at 1, id., Dec. 1982 at 1.
  • Weiser, Jury Screening Through Graphoanalysis: An Introduction, Dec. 1987 at 16.
  • Stout, The Problem with Jury Selection, or, Raise Your Hand if You are Prejudiced and Unfair, Nov. 1987 at 19.
  • Imwinkelried & Schwed, The Reform of Limiting Instructions on Uncharged Misconduct Evidence: A Case Study in the Drafting of Comprehensible Jury Instructions, Mar. 1987 at 6.
  • Rudolf, Insuring the Representativeness of the Jury Pool: CompositionalChallenges and Statutory Challenges (pts. 1 & 2), Aug. 1984 at 8, Sept./Oct. 1984 at 24.
  • Philipsborn, Preparing a Jury Composition Challenge, Sept./Oct. 1987 at 8.
  • Luginbuhl, Improving Voir Dire, Mar. 1986 at 12.
  • Hrones, The Lawyer as a Juror: An Inside View, Aug. 1986 at 11.
  • Ellmann, Capital Cases--Instructions on Death: Guiding the Jury's Sentencing Discretion in Capital Cases, Apr. 1986 at 20.
  • Hennenberg & DeVan, Conducting a Jury Voir Dire Through the Judge in Federal Distric Court, Mar. 1987 at 20.
  • An Interview With Cathy Bennett, Nov. 1984 at 10.
  • Bowman & Martin, Capital Cases--When Equivocal Isn't Enough, or, Do You Have Some Time to Kill?: A Logical Approach to Rehabilitating the Witt-Excludable Juror, Nov. 1986 at 38.
  • Carroll, Voir Dire for Capital Trials, Mar. 1984 at 23.
  • Mills & Bohannon, Do Personality or Peer Pressures Influence Way Jurors Decide?, Nov. 1981 at 7.
  • Mills & Bohannon, Sex, Race, Age, Education of Jurors--How Important Are They to Final Verdict?, Nov. 1981 at 7.

Justice.

  • Brown, Raymond M., Reflections On Rodney King And 'His' Case, July 1992 at 30.
  • Cogan, Dennis, The Long Legal Journey Of Clarence Chance And Benjamin Hill, June 1992 at 6.
  • Gorup, Geary, Of Justice Delayed And Mere Propinquity, May 1992 at 18.
  • Marcus, Paul, The Fall And Rise Of The Entrapment Defense, Sept./Oct. 1992 at 8.
  • Simon, Theodore, Rule 35 -- Back To The Future Or Taking A Second Bite, Sept./Oct. 1992 at 18.
  • Wyatt, James F. lll and Cook, Bobby Lee, Senior, Filing A Civil Rights Action As Part Of An Aggressive Criminal Defense, July 1992 at 14.

Juries.

  • Sevilla, Charles M., Jury Contamination Remedies, November 1991 at 17.

Juvenile Law.

  • Johnson, Knut S., Juvenile Delinquents & Federal Law, May 1991 at 6.


Introduction | Table of Contents | Home
Criminal Justice News/Issues | The Champion Magazine
About NACDL | Membership | Upcoming Events/Education
Legal Research | Publications & Tapes
Members Only

National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL)
1025 Connecticut Ave. NW, Ste. 901, Washington DC 20036
www.criminaljustice.org / www.nacdl.org
(202) 872-8600 / FAX(202) 872-8690 / assist@nacdl.com