Cumulative Article Index

Cade, Bonita, Ph.D.

Cade & Imwinkelried, Rape Trauma Syndrome Evidence, Mar. 1983 at 2.

Cain, Steve.

Cain, Steve, Verifying The Integrity Of Audio And Videotapes, July 1993 at 16.

Cambria, Paul J., Jr.

Cambria, Seasoned Greetings: Basic Strategies and Techniques for Representing a Witness Before a Grand Jury, Aug. 1982 at 1, reprinted in Mar. 1985 at 6.

Campbell, James Farragher.

Campbell, James Farragher, Developing a Defense Theme in the DUI Case, August 1998 at 23.
Campbell, Book Review, Jan./Feb. 1987 at 52 (reviewing J. HINGSON, HOW TO DEFEND A DRUNK DRIVING CASE: A GUIDE TO PRACTICAL, PROCEDURAL AND LEGAL ASPECTS (1986)).

Capital Cases

Stetler, Russell, Post-Conviction Investigation in Death penalty Cases, August 1999 at 41.

[Featured Online]

Stetler, Russell, Working With the Victim's Survivors in Death Penalty Cases, June 1999 at 42.

[Featured Online]

Stetler, Russell, Mental Disabilities and Mitigation, April 1999 at 49.

[Featured Online]

Stetler, Russell, Mitigation Evidence in Death Penalty Cases, Jan/Feb 1999 at 35.

[Featured Online]

Tally, Mary Ann, Integrating Theories for Capital Trials: Developing the Theory of Life, November 1998 at 34.

[Featured Online]

Baroff, George F., Why Mental Retardation is 'Mitigating', August 1998 at 33.

[Featured Online]

Lindsay, Stephen P., 'Do You Hear What I Hear?' Demonstrative Evidence Makes a Difference, June 1998 at 27.

[Featured Online]

Houlihan, Edith Georgi, Defending the Accused Child Killer, April 1998 at 23.

[Featured Online]

Bright, Stephen, Challenging Racial Discrimination in Capital Cases, Jan./Feb. 1997 at 19. [Featured Online]
Bright, Stephen, Does the Bill of Rights Apply Here Any More? Evisceration of Habeus Corpus and Denial of Counsel to Those Under Sentence of Death, November, 1996 at 25. [Featured Online]
Bright, Stephen, Obtaining Funds For Experts and Investigative Assistance, June 1997 at 31. [Featured Online]
Bright, Stephen, Preserving Error at Capital Trials, April 1997 at 43. [Featured Online]
Kreitzberg, Ellen, How Much Payne WIll the Courts Allow, Jan./Feb. 1998 at 31.

[Featured Online]

Lyon, Andrea D., Preservation Requirements after 1996 Habeus Bill Require Extensive Preparation, August 1997 at 37. [Featured Online]
McFeely, William S., A Legacy of Slavery and Lynching: The Death Penalty as a Tool of Social Control, November 1997 at 30. [Featured Online]
Wheelan, Dick, Investigating the Capital Case, July 1996 at 34. [Featured Online]
Wheelan, Dick, Significance of Simmons and Future Dangerousness, May 1996 at 30. [Featured Online]

Cardinale, Anthony M.

Cardinale, Anthony M., Bail After U.S. v. Salerno, Jan./Feb. 1991 at 8.

Carlyle, Elizabeth Unger

Carlyle, Elizabeth Unger, Federal Sentencing Strategy in the 90s: Contributions and Objections to Presentece Investigation Reports, June 1997 at 16.
Carlyle, Elizabeth Unger, Standards Of Review And Their Strategic Use, Jan./Feb. 1994 at 26.

Carpenter, W. Scott.

Carpenter, Caymen Islands: No Longer a Sanctuary of Financial Security, Aug. 1987 at 19.

Carroll, John L.

Carroll, Removing the Killers--The Touching Story of How Defense Counsel Came to Love Witherspoon, Apr. 1983 at 1.
Carroll, Voir Dire for Capital Trials, Mar. 1984 at 23.

Carter, Linda E.

Carter, Linda E. & Sims, John C. Representing Foreign Nationals: Emerging Importance of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations as a Defense Tool, Sept/Oct 1998 at 28.

[Featured Online]

Cassidy, Joe.

Cassidy, State to Test Electronic "Home Jail," May 1983 at 4.

Cassman, Ted.

Margolin & Cassman, When Government Requests in Mid-trial that Defense Witnesses Be "Mirandized" and Apprised of Their Rights, Jan./Feb. 1984 at 32.

Castelle, George

Castelle, George, Lab Fraud: Lessons learned from the Fred Zain Affair'', May 1999 at 12.

Cata, Alicia O.

Cata, Alicia O., Child Abuse v. Temporary Brittle Bone Disease, August 1988 at 16.

Caudill, Samuel P., Ph.D.

Hansen, Caudill & Boone, Crisis in Drug Testing: Results of CDC Blind Study, Jan./Feb. 1986 at 20.

Cei, ___, Ph.D.

Cei, The Alcoholic: Do We Yet Know What Works Best?, Dec. 1981 at 1.

Center for Nat'l Security Studies.

Center for Nat'l Security Studies, Public's Right to Know: The F.O.I.A., Jan./Feb. 1981 at 2 (reprinted excerpts from CENTER FOR NAT'L SECURITY STUDIES, USING THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT: A STEP BY STEP GUIDE (n.d.).

Challeen, Dennis A.

Challeen & Heinlen, Sentencing--Part Four. The Win-Onus Restitution Plan, Mar. 1981 at 9.

Chandler, Edward Witt.

Chandler, A Crime Free Society: Genetic Engineering, Mar. 1983 at 9.

Charlton, Mike

Charlton, Mike and J. Gary Trichter, Using Rule 403 in Felony Prosecutions to Preclude Proof of Prior DWI Convictions Before the Jury, August 1997 at 33.

Charng, Peter.

Chang, Peter A. Jr., The Sixth Amendment Right To Counsel, July 1992 at 20.

Charns, Alex.

Charns, The FBI and Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas: Alger Hiss's Replacement in the Communist Underground, Nov. 1984 at 6.

Chase, JoAnn.

Hollander & Chase, The Incompetent Child Witness, Nov. 1989 at 13.

Chaset, Alan J.

Chaset, Alan, 'Vacancy' at the Sentencing Commission: A Sign That Action Is Needed and Change Is Required, May 1999 at 33.
Chaset, Alan, Koon Opens Another Door: District of Columbia Circuit Permits 5K1.1 Departure Without Government Motion, December 1998 at 26. [Featured Online]
Chaset, Alan, Post-Conviction Update: Disparity in Responding to Substantial Assistance; More Amendments; Continuing Vacncies, July 1998 at 36. [Featured Online]
Chaset, Alan J., Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, July 1996 at 40.
Chaset, Alan J., Negotiating With Emily Latella: Nevermind, July 1996 at 39.
Chaset, Alan J., Rodney King Visits the Heartland: A Road to Be More Traveled?, May 1996 at 51.
Chaset, Alan J., Sentencing Guideline Update, July 1996 at 40.
Chaset, Video Review, June 1990 at 53 (reviewing PUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE, THROUGH THE WIRE (first airing June 26, 1990)).
Chaset, Alan J., Federal Criminal Practice: Prosecution And Defense (by Harry I. Subin, Chester L. Mirsky and Ian S. Weinstein) December 1992 at 35.
Chaset, Alan J., Federal Sentencing Guidelines Handbook (by Roger W. Haines, Jr., Kevin Cole and Jennifer C. Woll) August 1992 at 7.
Chaset, Alan J., Proposed Amendments To Sentencing Guidelines Forwarded To Congress, Sept/Oct 1993 at 23.
Chaset, Alan J., Post-Conviction Update: The Good,The Bad And The Very Ugly, Dec. 1994 at 42.
Ellis & Chaset, Federal Sentencing Guidelines: How to Grid and Bear It (pts. 1 &2), Nov. 1987 at 4 (Pt. I--Introduction and Overview), Jan./Feb. 1988 at 6 (Pt. II--Questions and Answers).
Chaset, Book Review, Dec. 1988 at 30 (reviewing B. GEORGE, THE COMPRHENSIVE CRIME CONTROL ACT OF 1984 (1986)).
Chaset, Alan J., Commission Issues Report On Cocaine And Federal Sentencing Policy: Hardly A Crack In The Door, May 1995 at 48;
Chaset, Alan J., Lateral Departures: Thirteen Does Not Have To Be An Unlucky Number, Dec. 1995 at 32;
Chaset, Alan J., Post-Conviction Update: The Good, The Not-So-Bad And The Downright Attractive, Sep./Oct. 1995 at 45.
Chaset, Alan and Ellis, Alan, How To Get Your Client Into 'Club Fed', December 1991 at 15.

Cheever, Joan.

Convery & Cheever, Orwellian Nightmare: Fact or Fiction?, Dec. 1983 at 34.

Cheshire, Joseph B., IV.

Cheshire, Ethics and the Criminal Lawyer: The Perils of Obstruction of Justice, Jan./Feb. 1989 at 12.

Child Sexual Abuse.

Lyons, Bruce, Damage Control In The Child Sex Abuse Defense, Jan./Feb. 1995 at 4.
Seahorn, Susan, Unreliability Of Child Witnesses In Sex Abuse Cases: A Tool For The Defense, Aug. 1995 at 27.
Gardner, Richard A, [Part 1] Indicators Of Pedophilia For The Accused Father, April 1994 at 33;
Gardner, Richard A, [Part 2] Indicators Of A Sex Abuse Accusation For The Child, Nov. 1994 at 42;
Gardner, Richard A, [Part 3] Indicators Of A Sex Abuse Accusation For The Accuser, Dec. 1994 at 32.
Daly, Lawrence W. and Pacifico, Frank J., Child Sexual Abuse column, December 1991.
Villaume, Philip G., Child Sexual Abuse column, Jan/Feb. 1991.
Allena, Thom and Witt, Philip, Child Sexual Abuse column, May 1991.

Clark, Dennis.

Clark, Dennis and Schaye, Natman, Effective Appellate Representation, August 1991 at 6.

Clark, James

Clark, James J. and Edward C. Monahan, Funds For Defense Expertise: What National Benchmarks Require, May 1997 at 12.
Clark, James J. and Edward C. Monahan, Funds For Resources for Indigent Defendants Represented by Retained Counsel, December 1996 at 16.

Clarke, Judy.

Clarke, Judy, Congress Oversteps Its Bounds, May 1997 at 9.
Clarke, Judy, A Conscience Check, April 1997 at 9.
Clarke, Judy, Crisis in Capital Representation, Jan./Feb. 1997 at 9. [Featured Online]
Clarke, Federal Sentencing Guidelines Update, Aug. 1988 at 16.
Clarke, Judy, Federal Sentencing Reform, May 1997 at 48.
Clarke, Judy, Hands of Cain, May 1997 at 9.
Clarke, Judy, Juvenile Justice? July 1997 at 11.
Clarke, Judy, Let's Tend to Our Grassroots! March 1997 at 9.
Clarke, Judy, Open Letter to Attorney General Reno, December 1996 at 9.
Clarke, Judy, Pendulum May Be Slowly Swinging, June 1997 at 9.
Clarke, Judy, Retrospective: Being True to Client and Profession, August 1997 at 7.
Clarke, Judy, Three Strikes Against Justice, November 1996 at 9.
Clarke, Trial Preparation: The Trial Notebook, June 1995 at 4.
Clarke, Judy, The Year Ahead, Sept./Oct. 1996 at 9.

Clark, Ramsey.

Champion Interview: Ramsey Clark, Aug. 1980 at 3.

Clear Water Act.

Whitesides, H.M., Jr., Motions Practice And Trial Of A Clean Water Act Case, July 1995 at 5.

Cleary, John.

Cleary, Criminal Code Reform Act of 1979: Reform or Repression, Jan./Feb. 1980 at 4 (NACDL Legislative Committee Position Paper).
Cleary, Legislative Alert, July 1983 at 16 (NACDL legislative position paper).

Cline, John D.

Cline, John D. Calculation of Loss Under the Sentencing Guidelines, Sept./Oct. 1996 at 43.

Cobb, Dale T., Jr.

Cobb, Women's Self-Defense, July 1982 at 2.

Cobb, Stanton L.

Cobb, The Adventures of Coolidge in Wonderland: Plain View and Inadvertence in the 1970's, Aug. 1981 at 2.

Cogan, Dennis.

Cogan, Dennis, The Long Legal Journey Of Clarence Chance And Benjamin Hill, June 1992 at 6.

Cohen, Carol.

May & Cohen, Pre-Trial Detention: Turning a Shield into a Sword, Nov. 1986 at 13.

Cohen, Harvey M.

Cohen, Chemical Testing Expert and The Lawyer, May 1984 at 17.

Cole, David

Cole, David, No Equal Justice: How the Crimianl Justice System Uses Inequality, Sept/Oct 1999 at 20. [Featured Online]

Cole, Spurgeon.

Nowaczyk, Dr. Ronald H. and Dr. Spurgeon Cole, Separating Myth From Fact: A Review Of Research On The Field Of Sobriety Tests, Aug. 1995 at 40.

Coleman, Lee, M.D.

Coleman, Medical Examination for Sexual Abuse: Have We Been Misled?, Nov. 1989 at 5.

Coliver, Sandra.

Margolin & Coliver, Forensic Uses of Hypnosis: An Update, July 1984 at 24.

Colvin, Emmett.

Linden, NACDL's Colvin to Succeed Ackerman as NCCD Dean, Mar. 1982 at 1 (interview with Emmett Colvin).

Competency. See also: Defenses; Witnesses.

Bishop, Book Review, Dec. 1980 at 5 (reviewing H. STEADMAN, BEATING A RAP?: DEFENDANTS FOUND INCOMPETENT TO STAND TRIAL (1979)).
Swift, Representing the Developmentally Disabled Offender, Apr. 1988 at 10.
Blume, Capital Cases--Representing the Mentally Retarded Defendant, Nov. 1987 at 32.

Condon, John W., Jr.

Condon, The Formation of the NACDL, Mar. 1983 at 1.

Confessions.

Baroff & Freedman, Mental Retardation and Miranda, Apr. 1988 at 6.
Snook, Book Review, Dec. 1986 at 40 (reviewing F. INBAU, J. REID & J. BUCKLEY, CRIMINAL INTERROGATION AND CONFESSIONS (3d ed. 1986)).
Lyon & Morrissey, In Case of Confession, May 1990 at 8.

Confrontation. See also: Evidence; Witnesses.

Graham, Difficult Times for the Constitution: Child Testimony Absent Face-to-Face Confrontation, Aug. 1985 at 18.
Graham, The Confrontation Clause and the Hearsay Rule: "Congruent or Not Congruent?"--That is the Question, May 1988 at 3.

Connaughton, James L.

Connaughton, James L. and Green, Thomas C., Defending Charges Of Environmental Crime-- The Growth Industry Of The 90s, April 1993 at 14.

Conom, Tom P.

Conom, Tom P., Privacy And The Fourth Amendment In The 21st Century, July 1995 at 13.
Conom, Tom P., Bulwarks Of Liberty: Presumption Of Innocence And Reasonable Doubt,December 1991 at 18.

Conroy, Sandra

Conroy, Sandra and John Lundquist, Defending Against Food and Drug Prosecution, July 1997 at 20. [Featured Online]

Conspiracy.

Hutton, Book Review, Mar. 1989 at 33 (reviewing P. MARCUS, PROSECUTION AND DEFENSE OF CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY CASES (1986)).

Flannery, Conspiracy: A Primer, Dec. 1988 at 4.

Constitutional law. See also, e.g.: Fourth amendment; Due Process; Right to privacy; Right to counsel; etc.

Hirsch, Book Review, Apr. 1987 at 26 (reviewing R. McNAMARA, CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS ON CRIMINAL PROCEDURE (1982 & 1985 Supp.)).
Hirsch, Book Review, Apr. 1987 at 26 (reviewing S. SINGER & M. HARTMAN, CONSTITUTIONAL CRIMINAL PROCEDURE HANDBOOK (1986)).
Hirsch, Fourth Amendment Forum--"Least Intrusive Means": The Supreme Court's Inadvertent Gift to the Defense, June 1988 at 17.
Lappas, Spero T., Thermal Imaging And The Fourteenth Amendment, June 1994 at 14.
Smith, David B., Are There Commerce Clause Limits To Congress' Power To Federalize The Criminal Code?, July 1994 at 17.

Controlled substances/Drugs.

Schoenburg, Peter and McCue, Steve, Practical Problems Confronting Racial Profiling on Our Highways, Sept/Oct 1999 at 35. [Featured Online]
Schoenburg, Peter and McCue, Steve, Supreme Court Holds Fifth Amendment Privilege Survives Guilty Plea in Federal Drug Case; High Court Extends Automobile Exception to Passengers' Belongings; Solis Redux: No Substantial Assistance Departures Without Government Motion, July 1999 at 41.
Schoenburg, Peter and McCue, Steve, Marijuana Law Opponents May Be Entitled To Sit as Jurors; Fifth Circuit Approves Downward Departure for Substantial Assistance Without Government Motion; More Help for Mules: Counsel May Be Ineffective for Failure to Seek Mitigating Role Adjustment, May 1999 at 28. [Featured Online]
Schoenburg, Peter and McCue, Steve, Signs Along the Highway -- Drug-DUI Checkpoint Held Unconstitutional; Signs Along Another Highway; Recent Developments, March 1999 at 29. [Featured Online]
Schoenburg, Peter and McCue, Steve, Substantial Assistance Departures Without Government Motion; Help for Mules; Prolonged Detention to Await Dog Sniff Not Supported By Reasonable Suspicion, December 1998 at 54.
Schoenburg, Peter and McCue, Steve, The Emperor Has No Clothes: Tenth Circuit Says Prosecutors Bribe Witnesses With Leniency Promises, Sept/Oct 1998 at 51.
Schoenburg, Peter and McCue, Steve, 'Don't Touch My bags' II; Drug Dogs -- 'Working the Net'; Supreme Court Holds Drug Type, Quantity Not Jury Issue, July 1998 at 29. [Featured Online]
Schoenburg, Peter and McCue, Steve, "Don't Touch My Bags"; Drug Dealing Is Not a Special Skill; Venue Instruction Required in Multi-District Narcotics Conspiracy, May 1998 at 37.
Schoenburg, Peter and McCue, Steve, New Ideas for Motions in Limine in Drug Courier Trials; Tenth Circuit Says "Bobo's" Alert Sufficient to Support Probable Cause, March 1998 at 27.
Schoenburg, Peter, The Guideline Commission v. Congress--Godzilla and King Kong Cattle over a Hit of LSD, March 1996 at 49.
Schoenburg, Peter, Pretextual Traffic Stops--the End of Judicial Control over Traffic Stops as a Ruse for Drug Searches?, March 1996 at 49.
Schoenburg, Peter, Retroactive Use of Bailey--Now that the Emperor Has No Clothes What Can We Do about It?, March 1996 at 50.
Schoenburg, Peter and Steve McCue, Back to the Future [what's left of it.] In Rem Civil Forfeitures Do Not Constitute Punishment uner the Double Jeopardy Clause-- Unites States v. Ursery, Sept./Oct. 1996 at 39.
Schoenburg, Peter and Steve McCue, Battling Two Sovereigns at Once-- 'Federal First' under United States v. Gonzales, for Resolving State and Federal Cases with 924[c] Counts, May 1997 at 29.
Schoenburg, Peter and Steve McCue, Booted from Boot Camp-- New Restrictions on the Federal ICC Program, December 1996 at 35.
Schoenburg, Peter and Steve McCue, BOP Too Restrictive in Awarding Sentence Reductions to Drug Abuse Treatment Program Graduates, May 1997 at 29.
Schoenburg, Peter and Steve McCue, Brady Violation Results in Double Jeopardy Dismissal, December 1997 at 31.
Schoenburg, Peter and Steve McCue, DEA Errs in Calculating Quantity of Methadone that Could Be Manufactured from Precursor Chemicals, Sept./Oct. 1996 at 40.
Schoenburg, Peter and Steve McCue, Eye of Newt, Toe of Frog, Wool of Bat, Tongue of Dog-- Veteran DEA Chemist Falsified Drug Test Results for Years, December 1996 at 34.
Schoenburg, Peter and Steve McCue, Lack of Record Keeping by Drug Dog 'Bobo's' Handler Results in a Franks Violation by DEA Agent in the Search Warrant Affidavit, December 1996 at 35.
Schoenburg, Peter and Steve McCue, New, Improved Election Year Meth Act, March 1997 at 49.
Schoenburg, Peter and Steve McCue, Only One Government Agent at Counsel Table, July 1997 at 37.
Schoenburg, Peter and Steve McCue, Prior Convictions Used to Enhance Minimum Mandatory Sentences Must Have Been Prosecuted By Indictment, July 1997 at 37.
Schoenburg, Peter and Steve McCue, Problems With Drug Detecting Dogs and Records Kept, July 1997 at 38.
Schoenburg, Peter and Steve McCue, Refusal to Take Bags Off Bus Was Not Abandonment, December 1997 at 32.
Schoenburg, Peter and Steve McCue, Sentences for Money Laundering and Drug Conspiracy-- Twin-Headed Monster of Docile Lap Dog, Sept./Oct. 1997 at 45.
Schoenburg, Peter and Steve McCue, Silent Spring-- Learning to Live with the Whren Decision, Sept./Oct. 1996 at 38.
Schoenburg, Peter and Steve McCue, Supreme Court Rejects Per Se Rule Allowing No Knock Entries in Drug Cases, Sept./Oct. 1997 at 46.
Genego, William J., Introduction and Explanation Of Amended Penalties Chart, April 1992 at 41.
Trebach, Arnold S. and Zeese, Kevin B., Judges Across The Country Are Speaking Out Against The Drug War, Sept./Oct. 1992 at 37.
Wampler, Dee, The Drug Package Profile, June 1992 at 14.
Abbell, Michael, Simple Possession column, May 1991.
Genego, William J., Controlled Substances column, November 1991 at 39.
Greenberg, Gary, Are DEA Lab Reports Fraudulent?, August 1991 at 16.
Silber, Alan, Simple Possession column, March 1991 .
Silber, Alan, NACDL Announces Drug Policy Debate, December 1991.
Fiedler & Zeese, Simple Possession--Mutual Concerns, Different Solutions, July 1990 at 40 (editorial on drug legalization).
Weiner, Simple Possession--Taking the Lid Off the Government's Silent Partner, Jan./Feb. 1990 at 19.
Pisani, Book Review, July 1988 at 20 (reviewing K. ZEESE,DRUG TESTING LEGAL MANUAL (1988)).
Ross, Book Review, July 1987 at 33 (reviewing S. WISOTSKY, BREAKING THE IMPASSE IN THE WAR ON DRUGS (1986)).
Fogelnest, Some Things Every State Practitioner Should Know About Federal Law, Sept./Oct. 1989 at 16.
Imwinkelried, Immunoassay Drug Testing, Aug. 1988 at 10.
Moffitt, Using the Insanity Defense in Drug Cases, TRYING A CRIMINAL CASE 3 (seminar presented in cooperation with NACDL and MCCDLA, Charlotte, NC, Mar. 31, 1990) (106 pp.).
Uelman, Weighing in Under the New Federal Drug Penalties, Apr. 1987 at 12.
Illegal Drug Profits, Apr./May 1980 at 17 (testimony of Deputy Assistant U.S. Attorney General Irwin B. Nathan before the Subcomm. on Investigations of the Senate Comm. on Government Affairs, Dec. 9, 1979).
Hupy, Challenging the Classification of Marijuana on Constitutional Grounds, Aug. 1983 at 28.
Hansen, Caudill & Boone, Crisis in Drug Testing: Results of CDC Blind Study, Jan./Feb. 1986 at 20.
Schoenburg, Peter, Cordless Phones Now Protected Under Title III, Aug. 1995 at 46;
Schoenburg, Peter, Drug Abuse Treatment Programs In Prison And Early Release, Nov. 1995 at 34;
Schoenburg, Peter, Drug Detecting Dog Found Unreliable -- Lack Of Record Keeping Cited, March 1995 at 23;
Schoenburg, Peter, Equal Cocaine Penalties, June 1995 at 41;
Schoenburg, Peter, Fully Informed Juries, Nov. 1995 at 34;
Schoenburg, Peter, Good News In The 1994 Crime Bill, June 1995 at 40;
Schoenburg, Peter, Lesser Penalties For 'Cocaine Base' Defendants, June 1995 at 40;
Schoenburg, Peter, Most U.S. Currency Is Contaminated With Cocaine -- Dog Alerts To Cash Are Not Probable Cause For Forfeiture, March 1995 at 25;
Schoenburg, Peter, Practicing Pointers For Double Jeopardy Dismissals After 'Halper', Aug. 1995 at 44;
Schoenburg, Peter, Sixth Circuit Recognizes Forfeiture/Double Jeopardy Violations, Nov. 1995 at 36;
Schoenburg, Peter, Using Fed. R. Evid. 615, June 1995 at 41;
Schoenburg, Peter, Well Deserved Credit, Nov. 1995 at 36.
Schoenburg, Peter, Nov. 1994 at 28; March 1994 at 21; Aug. 1994 at 42.
United States Dept. of Justice, Drug Enforcement Agency, D.E.A. Agents Must Retain Notes,Nov. 1980 at 9 (reprint of DEA internal operating instructions).
Schoenburg, Peter, Sept/Oct at 27, December 1993 at 35.

Converse, Kari.

Converse, Kari, Aliens And The Constitution, March 1992 at 6.
Converse, Book Review, Aug. 1990 at 65 (reviewing I. KURZBAN, KURZBAN'S IMMIGRATION LAW SOURCEBOOK (1990)).
Hollander & Converse, Immigration Implications for the Alien Defendant, (pts. 1 & 2), May 1986 at 29, June 1986 at 16.
Converse, Kari, Defending Immigrants in Peril, August 1997 at 10.
Converse, An Interview With Nancy Hollander, July 1988 at 6.
Converse, Keeping Dorothy in Kansas After Ozkok: New Strategies for Defending Non-Citizens, Mar. 1989 at 8.

Convery, John.

Convery & Cheever, Orwellian Nightmare: Fact or Fiction?, Dec. 1983 at 34.

Coody, David W.

Coody, Disarming the Armed Career Criminal Prosecution, June 1988 at 15.

Cook, Jacqueline.

Cook, Jacqueline and Wyrsch, James R., Amendment VI: Criminal Intent And Due Process, April 1991 at 10.

Cooper, Jonathan D.

Cooper, Jonathan D. and Steven Oberman, Attacking the Disclosure and Analysis of Hospital Blood-Alcohol Test Results, April 1997 at 36.
Cooper, Jonathan D, and Oberman, Steven, Evading Roadblocks On The Prosecution Highway (Part 1), Dec. 1994 at 38.
Oberman, Steven and Jonathan D. Cooper, Evading Roadblocks On The Prosecution Highway (Part 2), Jan./Feb. 1995 at 21.

Cooper, Stephen.

Cooper, Defending the Good Samaritan, Apr. 1985 at 12.

Core, Jane.

Hudson, Core & Schorr, Capital Cases--Using the Mitigation Specialist and the Team Approach, June 1987 at 33.

Cornett, Beverly S.

Cornett, Beverly S., Bosch, Donald & Richards, Stephen, Traffic and Automobile Factors Influencing DUI Arresets, June 1998 at 41.

[Featured Online]

Cossack, Roger L.

Cossack, And Then There Were Nine (Some Thoughts on U.S. v. Leon), Sept./Oct. 1984 at 12.

Cotsirilos, John G.

Philipsborn & Cotsirilos, A Change of Venue Roadmap, July 1986 at 8.

Cox, James L.

Halstead & Cox, Disclosure of Confidential Informants, Mar. 1988 at 6.

Cox, Jerry J.

Cox, Jerry J., Nov. 1994 at 49.

Crime Scene Investigations.

Lewis, David L., Crime Scene Investigations, March 1995 at 16.

Crooker, Constance Emerson

Crooker, Constance Emerson, The 'S' Stands for Snitch, November 1997 at 29.
Crooker, Constance Emerson, An Interpreter Checklist, June 1998 at 17. [Featured Online]

Crooks, Timothy

Crooks, Timothy, Sentencing Enhancements or Elements: What's In a Name?, Sept/Oct 1999 at 40.

Crown, Barry M., Ph.D.

Crown, The Psychologist's Role in Sentencing, May 1985 at 16.

Cullitan, Reginald.

Cullitan, The Exclusionary Rule Today: Recent Developments in the Field of Limited Use Exceptions, Apr. 1981 at 3.

Currency transaction reporting/Money laundering.

Guiberson, Book Review, Apr. 1985 at 36 (reviewing PRESIDENT'S COMM'N ON ORGANIZED CRIME, THE CASH CONNECTION: ORGANIZED CRIME, FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND MONEY LAUNDERING (1984)).
Foster, Right to Privacy in Bank Records After United States v. Miller: An Update, Sept./Oct. 1986 at 21.
Carpenter, Caymen Islands: No Longer a Sanctuary of Financial Security, Aug. 1987 at 19.

Curtis, Michael.

Curtis, Book Review, Nov. 1986 at 25 (reviewing M. BLINDER, LOVERS, KILLERS, HUSBANDS AND WIVES (1985)).
Curtis, Book Review, Apr. 1987 at 26 (reviewing P. GIANELLI & E. IMWINKELRIED, SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE (1986)).
Curtis, Book Review, Sept./Oct. 1986 at 37 (reviewing M. NAVA, THE LITTLE DEATH (1986)).

Cutler, Brian.

Cutler Brian; Moran Gary; Platania Judith, Prosecution Misconduct During The Penalty Phase Of Capital Trials: Harmless Error?, July 1994 at 19.

Dahlberg, Thomas R.

Dahlberg, Thomas R., The Presumption Of Innocence In Voir Dire, May 1993 at 24

Daly, Lawrence W.

Daly, Lawrence W. and Pacifico, Frank J., Child Sexual Abuse column, December 1991.

Daniels, Charles W.

Daniels, Charles W., Impeaching The Liar And The Fool With Feeling , December 1992 at 6.
Daniels, Charles, New Frontiers in Polygraph Evidence, July 1997 at 16.

Dasch, Susan.

Dasch, Book Review, Apr. 1988 at 39 (reviewing R. LEE, FEDERAL PRISONS: FACT AND FICTION (1987)).

Davis, David A.

Davis, David A., April 1993 at 33, A New Insanity Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, April 1993 at 33.
Davis, David A., When The Defendant Wants To Die, June 1992 at 45.

Davis, Neal

DeGuerin, Dick & Davis, Neal, If They Holler, Make 'Em Pay... The Hyde Amendment, Sept/Oct 1999 at 30. [Featured Online]

Dayan, Marshall.

Dayan, Marshall, Using Mitigating Evidence In Jury Selection In Capital Trials, July 1993 at 29;
Dayan, Marshall, The Penalty Phase Of The Capital Case: Good Character Evidence, June 1991 at 14.
Dayan, Marshall, Allocution In Capital Sentencing, November 1992 at 39.

Dean, Martin L.

Dean & Neal, With Electrons, Rather Than Ink: Automating the "Paper Factory," June 1982 at 15.

Death penalty.

Semel, Elisabeth, The Lone Star State Is Not Alone in Denying Due Process to Those Who Face Execution, July 1999 at 28.

[Featured Online]

Bright, Stephen, Death In Texas, July 1999 at 16.

[Featured Online]

Benetele, Ursula, The Eighth Amendment Should Be Interpreted To Stop Capital Punishment, April 1995 at 10.
Farmer, Millard, Joe Nursey, Kimellen Tunkle, and Steven Losch, Death Is Different: Reducing 'Politically Acceptable, Correct Executions' Is Our Duty, Nov. 1995 at 6.
Tolley, Edward D. and Ronald E. Houser, Federal Death Penalty Act Of 1994, June 1995 at 24.
Bryan, Robert R., Death Penalty Trials: The Innocence of Jerry Bigelow and Defense Creativity, December 1993 at 43.
Davis, David A., April 1993 at 33, A New Insanity: Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, April 1993 at 33.
Dayan, Marshall, Using Mitigating Evidence In Jury Selection In Capital Trials, July 1993 at 29;
Davis, David A., When The Defendant Wants To Die, June 1992 at 45.
Dayan, Marshall, Allocution In Capital Sentencing, November 1992 at 39.
Logan, Deanna Dorman, From Abused Child To Killer: Positing Links In The Chain, Jan./Feb. 1992 at 36
Norton, Lee, Mitigation Investigations, May 1992 at 43.
Dayan, Marshall, The Penalty Phase Of The Capital Case: Good Character Evidence, June 1991 at 14.
Quiqley, John and Shank, Adele, Capital Cases column, July 1991.
Hudsmith & Giarrusso, Capital Cases--"Grooming for the Kill": Forced Medication of the Insane Death Row Inmate to Render Him Competent to be Executed, Aug. 1990 at 36.
Balske, Capital Cases--R.E.T.R.I.A.L.S. (Rethinking Every Tactic Results In A Life Sentence): An Outline for Survival, Apr. 1990 at 22.
Mehler, Capital Cases--Antisocial Personality Disorder as Mitigating Evidence, June 1990 at 20.
Blum, Redick & Martin, Capital Cases--Death Penalty Resource Centers: Enforcing the Sixth Amendment or Grease for the Skids?, Nov. 1989 at 21.
Hall, Capital Cases--Compensating Capital Counsel in Federal Court, Aug. 1989 at 40
Koosed, Capital Cases--Dead Wrong: Mistaken Indentifications and Capital Prosecutions,June 1989 at 42.
NAT'L ASSN. CRIM. DEF. LAWYERS, DEATH PENALTY COMMITTEE, DEATH PENALTY TRAINING MANUAL (1986) (compilation of all articles pertaining to capital cases from Mar. 1984, through June 1986).
Bruck, Strom Thurmond's Executions, June 1981 at 1.
Carroll, Removing the Killers--The Touching Story of How Defense Counsel Came to Love Witherspoon, Apr. 1983 at 1.
McNally, Death is Different: Your Approach to a Capital Case Must be Different, Too, Mar. 1984 at 8.
Farmer & Nursey, Building Blocks of Capital Cases: Motions and Objections, Mar. 1984 at 16.
Carroll, Voir Dire for Capital Trials, Mar. 1984 at 23.
Weinheimer & Millman, Legal Issues Unique to the Penalty Trial, Mar. 1984 at 33.
Balske, The Penalty-Phase Trial: A Practical Guide, Mar. 1984 at 40.
Balske, Putting it All Together: The Penalty-Phase Closing Argument, Mar. 1984 at 47.
Balske, Now You See It, Now You Don't: The Demise of the Witherspoon Test and Other Important Developments in Death-Penalty Defense, Apr. 1985 at 22.
Redick & Martin, The Right to Experts in Capital Cases: The Implications of Ake v. Oklahoma, June 1985 at 6.
Blum, Investigation in a Capital Case: Telling the Client's Story, Aug. 1985 at 10.
Koosed, Capital Cases--Prosecutorial Misconduct in the Penalty Phase Closing Argument: The Improper Invitation to Kill (pts. 1 & 2), Nov. 1985 at 40, Dec. 1985 at 34.
Ellmann, Capital Cases--Instructions on Death: Guiding the Jury's Sentencing Discretion in Capital Cases, Apr. 1986 at 20.
Alphonso & Baur, Capital Cases--Enhancing Capital Defense: the Role of the Forensic Clinical Social Worker, June 1986 at 26.
Stebbins & Kenney, Capital Cases--Zen and the Art of Mitigation Presentation, or, the Use of Psycho-Social Experts in the Penalty Phase of a Capital Trial, Aug. 1986 at 14.
Bowman & Martin, Capital Cases--When Equivocal Isn't Enough, or, Do You Have Some Time to Kill?: A Logical Approach to Rehabilitating the Witt-Excludable Juror, Nov. 1986 at 38.
Koosed, Capital Cases--Federal Habeas Corpus Relief--Avoiding [A] Comity [Of] Errors,Jan./Feb. 1987 at 28.
Blum, Capital Cases--The Ten Commandments of Religious Testimony, Apr. 1987 at 23.
Hudson, Core & Schorr, Capital Cases--Using the Mitigation Specialist and the Team Approach, June 1987 at 33.
Porter, Capital Cases--May An Accomplice Receive the Death Penalty? The Tison v. Arizona Answer, Aug. 1987 at 24.
Blume, Capital Cases--Representing the Mentally Retarded Defendant, Nov. 1987 at 32.
Stebbins, Capital Cases--Psychologists and Mitigation: Diagnosis to Explanation, Apr. 1988 at 34.
Porter & Perry, Capital Cases--Discovery of Favorable Evidence: The Brady Rule, June 1988 at 30.
Bryan, Capital Cases--Death Penalty Trials: Lawyers Need Help, Aug. 1988 at 32.
Koosed, Capital Cases--Franklin v. Lynaugh: Can Lingering Doubt Linger Longer?, Nov. 1988 at 46.
Koosed, Capital Cases--Residual Doubt in the Post-Franklin v. Lynaugh Era, Jan./Feb. 1989 at 38.
Hill, Capital Cases--Rebutting the Presumption of Homicidal Intent from Evidence of Multiple Bullet Wounds, Apr. 1989 at 38.

Defenses.

Aron, Charles J., Ten Rules For Multi-Defendant Defenders, April at 18.
Bailey, "Have Shrink, Will Travel": Psychiatric Testimony and Specific Intent, Apr. 1989 at 5.
Batcheller, Book Review, Nov. 1989 at 42 (reviewing C. JEFFEREY, ATTACKS ON THE INSANITY DEFENSE (1985)).
Cobb, Women's Self-Defense, July 1982 at 2.
Epstein, James, Defense Of A Statement Case, Aug. at 10.
Fontana, Self Defense: Harnessing the Autonomic Nervous System, Nov. 1984 at 18.
Goldstein, The Entrapment Defense in a Nutshell, Dec. 1987 at 4.
Griffin, James A., Ten Tips For Attorneys With Tape-Recorded Evidence, Aug. at 5.
Hammond, Larry A. And Jon M. Sands, Trial By Fire: Preparing To Defend An Arson Case, April at 4.
Jaffe, The Diminished Capacity Defense, Apr. 1987 at 14.
Leesfield & Dutton-Douglas, "Faith and Love": Use of the Battered Woman Syndrome to Negate Specific Intent, Apr. 1989 at 9.
MacCarthy, The Insanity Defense: What is it and What Should it Be?, Sept./Oct. 1983 at 13.
Moran, Book Review, June 1987 at 38 (reviewing D. HERBERT & R. BARRETT, ATTORNEY'S MASTER GUIDE TO COURTROOM PSYCHOLOGY (1984)).
Schaye, Natman and Joseph Geffen, Beyond Insanity: Mental Illness -- A Constant Companion And Useful Tool In The Practice Of Criminal Defense, Sep./Oct. at 18.
Sevilla, "They Said I Could:" The Defense of Equitable Estoppel, June 1990 at 8.
Shein, Marcia G. and Cloud H. Miller, III, A 'Knowing, Intelligent And Voluntary' Plea: The Justice Department's Latest Oxymoron, Jan./Feb. at 10.
Tarlow, Barry, The Moral Conundrum Of Representing A Rat, Aug. at 15.
Uelman & Tennant, Endorphins, Addiction, and the Defense of Medical Necessity, Dec. 1985 at 6.
Walker, The Battered Woman Syndrome, Apr. 1982 at 8.Thomas, The Battered Woman: A Legal Defense, May 1982 at 7.
Eldridge, David M., Motion Practice In Environmental Crime Cases: The Hot Areas And How To Spot Them, April 1994 at 4.
Kiefer, Richard J., Defending Charges of Health Care Fraud, Sept./Oct. 1994 at 4.
Loftus, Elizabeth, Therapeutic Recollection Of Childhood Abuse: When A Memory May Not Be A Memory, March 1994 at 4.
McGuire, Andrew, Constitutional Limitations On A Criminal Defendant's Change Of Venue: The Next Step In Insuring Race Neutral Jury Selection?, June 1994 at 4.
Ramirez, Linda Friedman, Representing The Non-English Speaking Client, Jan./Feb. 1994 at 4.
Schaffer, Randy, Establishing The Defensive Theory Through Cross-Examination, May 1994 at 4.

DeGuerin, Dick

DeGuerin, Dick & Davis, Neal, If They Holler, Make 'Em Pay... The Hyde Amendment, Sept/Oct 1999 at 30. [Featured Online]

De La Garza, Kimberly.

De La Garza, Kimberly, .10% Solution column, August 1991.

Demarest, Richard S.

Demarest, Book Review, Mar. 1987 at 39 ("The Inside View," reviewing PRISONERS AND THE LAW (I. Robbins ed. 1985 & Supps.)).

Demonstrative Evidence.

Miller, Marvin, Demonstrative Evidence: Show and Tell, Sept./Oct. 1991 at 7.

Dennis, Warren L.

Dennis, Warren L., Burns, Arnold & Garcia-Bokor, Amybeth, Curbing Prosecutorial Excess: A Job for the Courts & Congress, July 1998 at 12. [Featured Online]

Dershowitz, Alan.

Dershowitz, Law Office Searches: the War on Crime Takes an Orwellian Turn, Aug. 1983 at 6.

Dershowitz, Nathan Z.

Dershowitz, Nathan Z. and Adelson, Amy Perfecting Federal Appeals, November at 31.

DeVan, Mark R.

Hennenberg & DeVan, Conducting a Jury Voir Dire Through the Judge in Federal Distric Court, Mar. 1987 at 20.

Diamond, Nancy.

Sinoway & Diamond, Fourth Amendment Forum--The Constitutionality of Warrantless Searches of Buildings in Open Fields, May 1989 at 36.

Dixon, Anne M.

Dixon, Anne M., Forfeiture of Marital Property: The Government v. The Innocent Spouse, Jan./Feb. 1992 at 12.

Dixon, William S.

Dixon, Book Review, June 1986 at 34 (reviewing P. KANE, MURDER, COURTS, AND THE PRESS (1986)).

DNA Task Force Reporting Column.

Scheck, Barry and Neufeld, Peter, June 1991 at 19, Jan./Feb. 1992 at 31

Dodd, Roger J.

Dodd, Roger J. and Pozner, Larry S., Controlling The Runaway Witness, May 1993 at 12.
Dodd, Roger J., and Pozner, Larry S., The Chapter Method Of Cross-Examination, Nov. 1994 at 33.
Dodd, Book Review, Nov. 1988 at 36 (reviewing D. FILTER, THE DEMONSTRATIVE EVIDENCE SOURCEBOOK (1985)).

Doggett, Stephen

Doggett, Stephen and Logene Foster, Vienna Convention: New Tool for Representing Foreign Nationals in the Criminal Justice System, March 1997 at 16. [Featured Online]

Dorsey, David B.

Dorsey, Around the Association--Executive Director's Report, passim.

Double Jeopardy.

Gerger, David, Relevant Conduct And Double Jeopardy, May 1994 at 20.
Novak, Edward F., The Double Jeopardy Implications Of Parallel Proceedings After Halper, August 1992 at 8.

Dow, William F. III

Dow, William F. III, Detention Center TEGWAR, June 1999 at 66.

Doyle, James

Doyle, James M., A Guide to First Closing Arguments, August 1998 at 20.
Doyle, James, No Confidence: A Step Toward Accuracy in Eyewitness Testimony, Jan./Feb. 1998 at 12. [Featured Online]

Drugs, See Controlled Substances.

Drunk driving/DWI/DUI/DUII.

Trichter, J. Gary & Samuelson, Christian, Pilots, DWI, Suspensions & Legal Malpractice, June 1999 at 18.

[Featured Online]

De La Garza, Kimberly, .10% Solution column, August 1991.
Trichter, J. Gary, .10% Solution column, March, April, August 1991.
Ethics Advisory Opinion, Formal Opinion 90-2, March 1991 at 40.
Ethics Advisory Opinion, Formal Opinion 90-3, April 1991 at 23.
Ethics Advisory Opinion, Formal Opinion 90-4, May 1991 at 27.
Rakoff, Jed, How Can You Defend Those Crooks?, August 1991 at 12.
Tarantino, The .10% Solution--Exculpatory Preliminary Breath Test Results, Aug. 1990 at 40.
Tarantino, The .10% Solution--Recent Cases: Trial by Jury; Jury Instructions; Urinalysis,July 1990 at 20.
Tarantino, The .10% Solution--Voir Dire in DWI Cases: A Checklist, June 1990 at 17.
Tarantino, The .10% Solution--Recent Cases: Preservation of Evidence; Scienter; Physician-Patient Privilege; Advance Publicity for Roadblocks, May 1990 at 27.
Tarantino, The .10% Solution--Compromising BAC Test Equipment, Apr. 1990 at 39.
Tarantino, The .10% Solution--Discovery in Drunk Driving Cases: an Update, Mar. 1990 at 25.
Tarantino, The .10% Solution--Constitutional Developments in Drunk Driving Cases,Jan./Feb. 1990 at 22.
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Dec. 1989 at 23 (roadblock evidence).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Nov. 1989 at 32 (roadblocks; implied consent; presumptions).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Sept./Oct. 1989 at 32 (preservation of evidence).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Aug. 1989 at 36 (breath test results).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, July 1989 at 43 (implied consent).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, June 1989 at 29 (right to counsel pre breath test).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, May 1989 at 40 (roadblocks).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Apr. 1989 at 28 (blood/breath partition ratios).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Mar. 1989 at 34 (statements at roadblocks).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Jan./Feb. 1989 at 22 (medical treatment test results).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Dec. 1988 at 26 (hospital lab reports; HGN).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Nov. 1988 at 30 (evidence problems).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Sept./Oct. 1988 at 24 (exculpatroy evidence; roadblocks).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Aug. 1988 at 35 (recent cases).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, July 1988 at 33 (sample motion for appointment of expert (for indigent client)).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, June 1988 at 26 (recent cases; various topics).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, May 1988 at 40 (refusals to submit to chemical test).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Apr. 1988 at 43 (right to jury trial).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Mar. 1988 at 40 (collateralestoppel).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Jan./Feb. 1988 at 39 (warrantless sobriety checkpoints).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Dec. 1987 at 36 (house arrest as sentencing option).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Nov. 1987 at 52 (expert witnesses (with expert witness interview form).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Sept./Oct. 1987 at 22 (recent cases).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Aug. 1987 at 40 (disovery (with sample discovery motion).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, July 1987 at 28 (critique of Henken Operator Safety Evaluation Technique and Contrast Sensitivity Test).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, June 1987 at 30 (attacks on chemical tests).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, May 1987 at 40 (contains client interview form).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Apr. 1987 at 16 (pretrial motions practice).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Mar. 1987 at 26 (right to counsel).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Jan./Feb. 1987 at 44 (improprieties in official forms).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Dec. 1986 at 30 (federal case interaction in DWI).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Nov. 1986 at 31 (statutes).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Sept./Oct. 1986 at 25 (suppression of breath tests; right to counsel; implied consent).
Tarantino, The 10% Solution, Aug. 1986 at 25 (listing of resource materials for DWI defense).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, July 1986 at 34 (constitutional arguments).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, June 1986 at 30 (Miranda issues).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, May 1986 at 47 (factors affecting breath tests).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Apr. 1986 at 42 (access to counsel; license revocation; double jeopardy).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Mar. 1986 at 37 (administrativehearings).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Jan./Feb. 1986 at 35 (implied consent).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Dec. 1985 at 38 (informant tips as cause for DWI stop)..
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Nov. 1985 at 32 (recent cases).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Sept./Oct. 1985 at 34 (right to counsel; roadblocks).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Aug. 1985 at 34 (double jeopardy in DWI cases).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, July 1985 at 31 (effective assisstance of and right to counsel).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, June 1985 at 31 (recent cases).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, May 1985 at 41 (partition ratio).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Apr. 1985 at 28 (sentencing issues).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Mar. 1985 at 38 (discussing relationship of DWI to vehicular homicide).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Jan./Feb. 1985 at 30 (effective assistance of counsel in the DWI context).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Dec. 1984 at 37 (constitutional issues).
Tarantino, .10% Solution--The Spectre of Prior DWI Convictions, Nov. 1984 at 31.
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Sept./Oct. 1984 at 36.
Tarantino, .10% Solution--Demonstrative Evidence in The DWI Case, Aug. 1984 at 34.
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, July 1984 at 37 (blood testing).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, June 1984 at 32 (evidentiary issues).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, May 1984 at 38 (synopsis of recommendations from President's National Commission on Drunk Driving).
Tarantino, The .10% Solution, Apr. 1984 at 32 (critique of Intoximeter 3000 and Smith and Wesson Breathalyzer 2000).
Campbell, Book Review, Jan./Feb. 1987 at 52 (reviewing J. HINGSON, HOW TO DEFEND A DRUNK DRIVING CASE: A GUIDE TO PRACTICAL, PROCEDURAL AND LEGAL ASPECTS (1986)).
Pangman, Book Review, Dec. 1988 at 30 (reviewing L. TAYLOR, DRUNK DRIVING DEFENSE (2d. ed 1986 & Supp. 1988)).
Howard, Book Review, Aug. 1986 at 23 (reviewing J.TARANTINO, DEFENDING DRINKING DRIVERS (2d ed. 1986) and J. TARANTINO, DWI DEFENSE FORMS AND CHECKLISTS (1984 & Supps.)).
Tarantino, The 10% Solution, passim (monthly column devoted to DWI/DUI issues).
Smith, Science, the Intoxilizer, and Breath Alcohol Testing (pts. 1 & 2), May 1987 at 8, id.,June 1987 at 5.
Shuy, Comprehensibility in the DWI Arrest, May 1987 at 23.
Tarantino & Rocha, Constitutional Problems of Roadblock Seizures, Aug. 1984 at 25.
Pangman, Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus: The New Drunk Driving Alchemy, Apr. 1987 at 6.
Tarantino & Kelly, How to Get the State to Dismiss Your Case and Pay Your Attorney Fees,Sept./Oct. 1983 at 9.
Kaster, RFI Testing on Breath Alcohol Measuring Devices: The NBS-NHTSA Cover-Up, May 1984 at 8.
Hlastala, Physiological Errors Associated with Alcohol Breath Testing, July 1985 at 16.
Fitzgerald & Hume, Erroneous Expert Opinions in the Civil and Criminal Trial of Intoxication Cases: Widmark Revisited, Dec. 1983 at 6.
Fitzgerald & Hume, The Single Chemical Test for Intoxication: A Challenge to Admissibility,June 1984 at 8.
Ahern, To Breathalize or Not to Breathalize? That is the Question, Jan./Feb. 1983 at 2 (due process and coercion issues of implied consent laws).
Hupy, Is There Life After Burg v. Municipal Court?: An Evidentiary Approach to Challenging the .10 Statute, Dec. 1984 at 23.
Howard, Book Review, Aug. 1986 at 23 (reviewing J. TARANTINO, DEFENDING DRINKING DRIVERS (2d ed. 1986) and J. TARANTINO,DWI DEFENSE FORMS AND CHECKLISTS (1984 & Supps.).
Trichter, J. Gary, W. Troy McKinney, and Michael Peña, Demonstrative Evidence In DUI Cases, May 1995 at 4.

Due process.

Konkel & Imwinkelried, The Due Process Implications of Unnecessary Destructive Scientific Tests, May 1983 at 6.

Dutton-Douglas, Mary Ann.

Leesfield & Dutton-Douglas, "Faith and Love": Use of the Battered Woman Syndrome to Negate Specific Intent, Apr. 1989 at 9.

National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL)
1025 Connecticut Ave. NW, Ste. 901, Washington DC 20036
www.criminaljustice.org / www.nacdl.org
(202) 872-8600 / FAX(202) 872-8690 / assist@nacdl.com